Bl.ocks VS the xonsh shell

- elijah meeks has some force collision label work that he's done, though I don't know where it lives. I'd google around, it may have lived on bl.ocks.org; there may be more up-to-date stuff too. Source: 11 months ago

D3 is luckily a very popular library with lots of resources available. I'd suggest also checking out bl.ocks and Observable for great examples. The latter one is amazing if you just want to do statistics/visualization work, since it acts like a Jupyter-like notebook environment. Source: about 2 years ago

Yeah, for that use case, https://bl.ocks.org is better than CodePen. Publish a GitHub gist, replace gist.github.com with bl.ocks.org, and sneak in "/raw" between the username and the gist id. You can even point to specific commit hashes. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

The harder way: Follow an example of someone coding the visualization on their local set up (which may be hard to find depending on what your are looking for as a lot of D3 examples have migrated to Observable). But here is an old glossary of examples it is on an old website called Bl.ocks that showed D3 examples using Github gists. Source: over 2 years ago

That's great, and hey maybe I'll steal some of your recipes from your blog too :) Currently I'm following https://bl.ocks.org/ for inspiration and don't have too many other sources to read through, but your blog seems like it's filled w/ topics on data viz & getting around pain points, I'm all about it! Source: over 2 years ago

Friends, I'm not saying that tools like zx are not good. I do like to write some scripts using js/ts. I believe pythoners prefer https://xon.sh/ . Perl is also attractive and interesting. Fish is friendly. However, I still believe that posix-shell has its own advantages. The balance among size, code length, and expressiveness. I think the only possible competitors are tcl and perl, maybe lua. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Sorry for the hijack, but I've been using xonsh[1] since 2018. It's a shell with Python syntax. If you dislike Bash scripting, and know Python, please consider this! [1] https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Those of you who use (or used) this as your shell: care to share your experience? It seems a lot less full-featured than https://xon.sh/, but maybe you don't need a lot of bells and whistles for regular usage. I mostly run build, execute, and install commands. I'm somewhat enticed at the possibility of being able to wrap common executables into forms that are typed (like nushell or elvish) and manipulate them in a... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

In that case, is it even more similar to xonsh? https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Not to hijack, but also consider xonsh[1]. It's Python based, and all your scripts can be Python (or hybrid-Python). I've been using it for both Windows and Linux for over 5 years. [1] https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago