Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register   |   login

bitHound VS Reviewable

Compare bitHound VS Reviewable and see what are their differences


Discover, monitor and address the complexity, maintainability and fragility of your software

GitHub code review platform.
bitHound Landing Page
bitHound Landing Page
Reviewable Landing Page
Reviewable Landing Page
bitHound details
Categories
Code Coverage Code Quality Code Collaboration
Website bithound.io  
Pricing URL Official bitHound Pricing  
Details $-
Platforms
-
Release Date-
Reviewable details
Categories
Code Review Code Quality Code Coverage Code Collaboration
Website reviewable.io  
Pricing URL-
Details $-
Platforms
-
Release Date-

bitHound Pricing
bitHound Pricing Screenshot
Category Popularity beta
0-100% (relative to bitHound and Reviewable)
56
56%
44%
44
41
41%
59%
59
38
38%
62%
62
100
100%
0%
0

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bitHound and Reviewable, you can also consider the following products

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator

SonarQube - SonarQube is code review and management software. The software is developed by SonarSource, which was founded in 2008 by Freddy Mallet, Simon Brandhof and Olivier Gaudin. Read more about SonarQube.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Coveralls - Coveralls is a code coverage history and tracking tool that tests coverage reports and statistics for engineering teams.