bauh VS MacPorts
Compare bauh VS MacPorts and see what are their differences
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
bauh
Snap Store
Pamac
AppImagePool
Synaptic
Octopi
GNOME Software
AppImageLauncher
MacPorts
Homebrew
Homebrew Cask
pkgsrc
Conda
Chocolatey
NixOS
Rudix
bauh MacPortsBased on our record, bauh should be more popular than MacPorts. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Like bauh which supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. Source: 12 months ago
If you really want a GUI package manager that doesn't break EndeavourOS, I've had a good experience with bauh when I started using EOS. But I also do everything with yay now, as others have suggested, it is more convenient once you know the commands. Source: over 1 year ago
Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists. Source: over 1 year ago
Is it an AppImage? Did you make it executable? If you use a lot of AppImages then you may want to add DE integration via their utility. I do not use it, as it runs a backgroudn daemon, I prefer using bauh instead. Source: over 1 year ago
You can use bauh. Supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. GitHub. Source: almost 2 years ago
Brew & macports have libvirt & virt-manager that are used to manage qemu via GUI. Source: over 1 year ago
Or instead of all this, try MacPorts[0], which in my experience has 99% of what you need. The biggest drawbacks are less support from quite niche packages (the ones that sets up its own homebrew tap), and a bit slower updates. But then I found it bearable much more than homebrew’s downsides. [0]: https://macports.org. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
You can install wireguard-go and wireguard-tools (or boringtun, which is Cloudflare's userspace implementation) using either MacPorts or Brew. Source: almost 2 years ago
That being said, I'm going to assume that you're working on MacO. Flatpaks aren't going to be an option, that's only going to work if you're using Linux (like Fedora, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Arch, Mint, and so on). If you need to install HandBrake, you may want to consider using macports.org, or brew.sh, these are projects that provide additional libraries and packages for MacOS, this way you can install additional... Source: about 2 years ago
On macOS you can also install the latest release with MacPorts:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Snap Store - An in-app shopping experience from Snapchat 🐶🔥
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS
Pamac - Graphical Package Manager for Manjaro Linux (based on libalpm).
Homebrew Cask - Install with ease. Your software is just one command away from being ready and raring to go. Forget all about babysitting the install process step by step, from website to cleanup. ls /usr/local/Caskroom google-chrome .
AppImagePool - A simple, modern AppImageHub Client made for linux using flutter.
pkgsrc - pkgsrc is a framework for building over 17,000 open source software packages.