bauh VS Chocolatey
Compare bauh VS Chocolatey and see what are their differences
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
bauh
Snap Store
Pamac
AppImagePool
Synaptic
Octopi
GNOME Software
AppImageLauncher
Chocolatey
Ninite
Scoop
Homebrew
Just Install
Patch My PC
PDQ Deploy
WAPT Community
bauh ChocolateyBased on our record, Chocolatey seems to be a lot more popular than bauh. While we know about 252 links to Chocolatey, we've tracked only 12 mentions of bauh. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Like bauh which supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. Source: 11 months ago
If you really want a GUI package manager that doesn't break EndeavourOS, I've had a good experience with bauh when I started using EOS. But I also do everything with yay now, as others have suggested, it is more convenient once you know the commands. Source: over 1 year ago
Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists. Source: over 1 year ago
Is it an AppImage? Did you make it executable? If you use a lot of AppImages then you may want to add DE integration via their utility. I do not use it, as it runs a backgroudn daemon, I prefer using bauh instead. Source: over 1 year ago
You can use bauh. Supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. GitHub. Source: almost 2 years ago
Chocolatey Windows software management solution, we use this for installing Python and Deno. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Authenticating with Kyma is a (in my opinion) unnecessary challenge as it leverages the OIDC-login plugin for kubectl. You find a description of the setup here. This works fine when on a Mac but can give you some headaches on a Windows and on Linux machine especially when combined with restrictive setups in corporate environments. For Windows I can only recommend installing krew via chocolatey and then install the... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
On a Windows machine, you can use Chocolatey by running the command. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I've used WSL2 and GHC/Nix--worked without any issues. However, there is Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org/. Source: 6 months ago
For OSX there is homebrew or pyenv (pyenv is another solution on Linux). As pyenv compiles from source it will require setting up XCode (the Apple IDE) tools to support this which can be pretty bulky. Windows users have chocolatey but the issue there is it works off the binaries. That means it won't have the latest security release available since those are source only. Conda is also another solution which can be... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Snap Store - An in-app shopping experience from Snapchat 🐶🔥
Ninite - Ninite is the easiest way to install software.
Pamac - Graphical Package Manager for Manjaro Linux (based on libalpm).
Scoop - A command-line installer for Windows
AppImagePool - A simple, modern AppImageHub Client made for linux using flutter.
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS