bauh VS AppImageHub

Compare bauh VS AppImageHub and see what are their differences

Flagsmith

Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

bauh

bauh (ba-oo), formerly known as fpakman, is a graphical interface for managing your Linux software (packages/applications). It currently supports the following formats: AppImage, ArchLinux repositories/AUR, Flatpak, Snap and Web applications.

AppImageHub

AppImage applications for Linux without installation

Landing page //
2023-10-07

Landing page //
2022-07-10

Review Bauh semangka 🍉 || Kebun Buah Segar

AppImageHub videos

No AppImageHub videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to bauh and AppImageHub)

bauh

AppImageHub

Front End Package Manager

51 51%

Front End Package Manager

49% 49

Software Marketplace

51 51%

Software Marketplace

49% 49

Work Music

100 100%

Work Music

0% 0

Package Manager

34 34%

Package Manager

66% 66

User comments

Share your experience with using bauh and AppImageHub. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bauh should be more popular than AppImageHub. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

bauh mentions (12)

Imade a simple shell script program to manage packages in Linux. Currently it supports apt, flatpak, snap. It can probably be useful for someone.
Like bauh which supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. Source: 11 months ago
Problems installing many apps
If you really want a GUI package manager that doesn't break EndeavourOS, I've had a good experience with bauh when I started using EOS. But I also do everything with yay now, as others have suggested, it is more convenient once you know the commands. Source: over 1 year ago
Name a program that doesn't get enough love!
Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists. Source: over 1 year ago
BalenaEtcher appimage is not clickable?
Is it an AppImage? Did you make it executable? If you use a lot of AppImages then you may want to add DE integration via their utility. I do not use it, as it runs a backgroudn daemon, I prefer using bauh instead. Source: over 1 year ago
Boutique: a Flatpak app store (alpha) feedbacks are welcome
You can use bauh. Supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. GitHub. Source: almost 2 years ago

AppImageHub mentions (3)

Tmux install script I made to install the latest stable version
Of course, tmux isn't the only software that you might want the latest release for. Happily, there's a lot of AppImages available. Source: about 2 years ago
Ubuntu 21.10, desnapified
And this is the backend for AppImageHub, I think: Https://appimage.github.io/apps/ (I'm a bit confused regarding who runs what...). Source: over 2 years ago
Chrome 95.0.4638.54-1 on RH7 now requires glibc 2.18.
Sorry to suggest something in response to a rant, but is nearly a container okay, i.e., an AppImage? https://appimage.github.io/apps/, https://apprepo.de/ or https://www.appimagehub.com/ may have something. Alas often AppImages don't want the bulk of including glibc so they might fail anyway. Source: over 2 years ago