Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Bat VS websocketd

Compare Bat VS websocketd and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Bat logo Bat

A cat(1) clone with wings.

websocketd logo websocketd

Turn any program that uses STDIN/STDOUT into a WebSocket server. Like inetd, but for WebSockets.
  • Bat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • websocketd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-27

Bat features and specs

  • Syntax Highlighting
    Bat provides syntax highlighting using the same syntax definitions as Sublime Text, which makes it easier to read code and configuration files compared to plain `cat`.
  • Git Integration
    Displays Git modifications alongside code, showing added, removed, and changed lines, which helps in tracking changes directly within the file contents.
  • Line Numbering
    Automatically includes line numbers in the output, which can be very useful for referencing specific lines without additional commands or tools.
  • Paging Support
    Integrates with paging utilities like `less` by default, allowing users to scroll through large files smoothly.
  • Compatibility
    Designed to be a drop-in replacement for `cat`, meaning it can be used in scripts and interactively without significant changes.
  • File Concatenation
    Like `cat`, Bat can concatenate files, streaming their content in a readable format with added enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of Bat

  • Installation Requirement
    Unlike `cat`, which is pre-installed on most Unix systems, Bat may require manual installation, adding an extra step before use.
  • Performance Impact
    The additional features like syntax highlighting and Git integration may cause a slight delay compared to the instantaneous output of `cat`, especially for very large files.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Relies on other tools, like `less`, for full functionality, which may not be available in minimal environments.
  • Complexity for Simple Tasks
    For users who need to quickly view file contents without any enhancements, Bat's additional features may be overkill.
  • Resource Usage
    Consumes more system resources like memory and CPU compared to `cat`, particularly noticeable when dealing with very large files or using extensive syntax highlighting.

websocketd features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Websocketd is straightforward to use, turning any local executable into a WebSocket server. It requires minimal configuration and setup, making it accessible for beginners.
  • Language Agnostic
    Since websocketd can wrap any executable, developers can use it with any programming language they prefer, allowing for flexibility in choosing the right tools for their projects.
  • Lightweight
    Websocketd is a lightweight tool with minimal overhead, making it ideal for projects that require efficient WebSocket communication without the need for a full-featured server.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The ease of setting up websocketd allows developers to quickly prototype WebSocket applications and test new ideas without significant investment in infrastructure.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, websocketd benefits from community contributions and transparency, ensuring continuous improvement and trustworthiness of the software.

Possible disadvantages of websocketd

  • Limited Features
    While its simplicity is an advantage, websocketd's feature set is minimal. It does not provide advanced capabilities such as authentication, performance monitoring, or compression.
  • Lack of Built-in Scalability
    Websocketd doesn't come with built-in support for high scalability or distributed systems, which can be a limitation for applications needing to handle a large number of simultaneous connections.
  • No Native HTTP Support
    Websocketd is focused solely on WebSockets, so it lacks native support for serving regular HTTP endpoints, which may necessitate additional infrastructure for projects requiring mixed communication.
  • Manual Process Management
    Developers have to handle process management manually, which includes ensuring the stability of wrapped programs and addressing issues that arise from resource limits.
  • Community Size
    Compared to more established tools, websocketd has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources in terms of documentation, tutorials, and community support.

Bat videos

$30 WOOD BAT vs $150 WOOD BAT - Louisville Slugger Wood Bat Reviews - Bat Bros in VEGAS

More videos:

  • Review - Hitting with the 2021 DEMARINI THE GOODS 2-Piece - BBCOR Baseball Bat Reviews
  • Review - Hitting with the MARUCCI CAT9 & CAT9 CONNECT - BBCOR Baseball Bat Reviews

websocketd videos

No websocketd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bat and websocketd)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Note Taking
100 100%
0% 0
APIs
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Bat and websocketd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bat seems to be a lot more popular than websocketd. While we know about 110 links to Bat, we've tracked only 4 mentions of websocketd. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bat mentions (110)

  • Man pages are great, man readers are the problem
    I page man (and many other things) through bat[0] which improves my experience. [0]: https://github.com/sharkdp/bat. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • What to do when your git worktree is not detecting file changes
    My cat replacement (bat), shows the changed lines. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Rewriting essential Linux packages in Rust
    I also really like: https://github.com/eza-community/eza (modern ls replacement) https://github.com/BurntSushi/erd (modern tree replacement) https://github.com/sharkdp/bat (modern cat(1) replacement) my .zshrc for every system now uses these as drop in replacements. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Wombat - Syntax Highlighting with Rust's Bat Called from Crystal
    Have you heard of the command-line tool bat, written in Rust? Bat is a command-line tool similar to cat that displays file contents in the terminal, but with additional features like line numbering, syntax highlighting, and paging. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Hyperfine: A command-line benchmarking tool
    Perhaps interesting (for some) to note that hyperfine is from the same author as at least a few other "ne{w,xt} generation" command line tools (that could maybe be seen as part of "rewrite it in Rust", but I don't want to paint the author with a brush they disagree with!!): fd (find alternative; https://github.com/sharkdp/fd), and hexyl (hex viewer; - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

websocketd mentions (4)

  • ht: Headless Terminal
    Reminds me quite a bit of websocketd as well, which converts a stdin/stdout program to a websocket: http://websocketd.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Structured Logging with Slog
    I hadn't even considered collecting traces/spans in this way yet, and have taken the approach of "stuff outputting logs in JSON format to stderr/local file". I usually end up writing a (temporary, structured) log message with the relevant span tags, but wouldn't it would be much better to run the actual trace/span code and be able to verify it locally without the ad-hoc log message? The prototype I built is a web... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • WebSocket to TCP bridge for game servers? Alternative to websockify?
    I also used to use this (http://websocketd.com/) along with netcat(1) before just biting the bullet and writing my own websocket library for our server as we needed to scale up slightly. Source: about 2 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Http://websocketd.com/ (Runs command line C or C++ programs as websocket programs, similar to inetd / CGI). Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bat and websocketd, you can also consider the following products

fd - A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.

Hook Relay - So you want to add webhooks to your app, and after having worked with the webhooks that Stripe provides, you want yours to be as great as theirs.

fzf - A command-line fuzzy finder written in Go

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

Starship (Shell Prompt) - Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.

WP Webhooks Pro - Do everything within WordPress without WordPress.