Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Backbone.js VS UI Faces

Compare Backbone.js VS UI Faces and see what are their differences

RealityMAX
RealityMAX is the AI-powered 3D design collaboration platform, 100% online. Cooperate remotely with your colleagues on 3D projects and easily share your work with clients. Create Web3D and AR experiences in a snap, without a line of code. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Backbone.js logo Backbone.js

Give your JS App some Backbone with Models, Views, Collections, and Events

UI Faces logo UI Faces

Avatars for design mockups
  • Backbone.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • UI Faces Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-10

Backbone.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Backbone.js is minimal and lightweight, which means it has a small footprint and adds very little overhead to your project.
  • Flexibility
    Backbone.js provides a flexible structure to developers by allowing them to build their own MVC or MVP architectures using models, views, collections, and routers.
  • Ease of Integration
    Backbone.js can be easily integrated with other libraries and frameworks, such as jQuery or underscore.js, enhancing its capabilities without much difficulty.
  • Large Community
    Backbone.js has been around for a long time, resulting in a large community and a plethora of plugins and extensions that can be leveraged.
  • Detailed Documentation
    The official site offers comprehensive documentation which includes tutorials, examples, and a detailed API reference, aiding developers to understand and utilize the library efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Backbone.js

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    New developers might find Backbone.js difficult to learn due to its non-opinionated nature and lack of enforced structure.
  • Sparse In-Built Features
    Backbone.js provides only the basic building blocks, requiring developers to write more boilerplate code or rely on external libraries for additional functionalities.
  • Outdated
    As newer frameworks and libraries (like React, Vue, and Angular) have emerged with more robust features and better performance, Backbone.js has somewhat fallen out of favor in modern development practices.
  • Event Binding Complexity
    Managing event bindings in Backbone.js can become complex and sometimes messy in large applications, which can lead to difficult maintenance and debugging.
  • Limited Two-Way Data Binding
    Backbone.js does not provide two-way data binding out-of-the-box, unlike other frameworks such as Angular, necessitating additional code to sync views and models.

UI Faces features and specs

  • Extensive Collection
    UI Faces provides an extensive collection of high-quality, diverse facial images, making it easy to find suitable avatars for various design needs.
  • Customizability
    The platform allows users to filter images based on several attributes such as age, gender, emotion, and skin color, offering a tailored selection to match project requirements.
  • Free Plan Available
    UI Faces offers a free plan, which makes it accessible for designers and developers with limited budgets or those who want to try out the service before committing to a paid plan.
  • Easy Integration
    UI Faces can be easily integrated into various design tools like Sketch, Figma, or Adobe XD, streamlining the workflow for designers.
  • API Access
    The service provides API access, allowing developers to programmatically fetch images, which is useful for automation and scaling design processes.

Possible disadvantages of UI Faces

  • Limited Free Access
    The free plan only offers limited access to the library and features, which might not be sufficient for larger projects or more complex needs.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on an external service for images can be a risk if the service faces downtime or changes its terms of use unexpectedly.
  • Potential Overuse of Same Images
    Since the collection is not infinite, there is a possibility that the same faces could be used across multiple projects, reducing the uniqueness of some designs.
  • Privacy and Ethical Considerations
    Using real people's faces in design projects can raise privacy and ethical issues, especially if the images are not used in an appropriate context or without proper consent.
  • Cost for Full Features
    To access the full range of features and the complete library, users need to subscribe to a paid plan, which could be a deterrent for some individuals or small teams.

Analysis of UI Faces

Overall verdict

  • UI Faces is a valuable resource for designers seeking to enhance the realism of their UI prototypes. It is well-regarded for its ease of use and the diversity of its avatar collection, making it a good choice for those needing placeholder images that add human elements to design projects.

Why this product is good

  • UI Faces is considered beneficial because it provides a vast collection of user avatar photos, which are particularly useful for UI/UX designers aiming to create more realistic and relatable web and mobile app prototypes. The platform aggregates avatars from multiple sources, offering a diverse range of images that help make user interfaces look authentic.

Recommended for

  • UI/UX designers
  • Web developers
  • App developers
  • Design students
  • Prototype creators

Backbone.js videos

+ Add

Introduction to Backbone.js

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Backbone.js
  • Review - Backbone.js Code Review w Backbone.js Mentor Jonathon

UI Faces videos

+ Add

UI Faces with ReactJS and Context API: Part 1 - Tools and Project Setup

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Backbone.js and UI Faces)

Backbone.js

UI Faces

JavaScript Framework
100 100%
JavaScript Framework
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
AI
0 0%
AI
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Backbone.js and UI Faces. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Backbone.js and UI Faces

Backbone.js Reviews

20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
A veteran on the scene, Backbone.js is all about giving structure to your JavaScript-heavy applications. It’s standing the test of time, enabling you to keep your data logic and display logic neatly side by side, all while being lightweight.
Source: tms-outsource.com
9 Best JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2023
Backbone.js is based on the Model View Controller (MVC) design pattern. The library supports seven components: Models, Views, Collections, Routers, Events, Sync, and Options. Backbone.js also provides an asynchronous communication layer that allows the application to communicate with a backend service.
Source: ninetailed.io
JavaScript: What Are The Most Used Frameworks For This Language?
Backbone.JS is a lightweight JavaScript library that provides a framework for developing structured and scalable web applications. It offers a set of tools for building client-side applications that interact with RESTful APIs. Backbone.JS is well-suited for developing single-page applications (SPAs) where most of the user interface is rendered in the browser, rather than...
Source: www.bocasay.com
20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Backbone.js is a JavaScript-based framework that connects to an API via a RESTful JSON interface. Backbone.js is known for being small and light because it only requires jQuery and one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, to use the entire library.
Source: www.lambdatest.com
Top JavaScript Frameworks For Mobile App Development
Backbone JS is a JavaScript framework based on the MVP app design. As the name suggests, it acts as a strong backbone to your project. It is lightweight in nature and hence, is considered ideal for developing single-page applications. It offers a simplistic frontend and makes the best use of JavaScript functions.
Source: medium.com

UI Faces Reviews

We have no reviews of UI Faces yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Backbone.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Backbone.js mentions (17)

  • JavaScript Views, the Hard Way – A Pattern for Writing UI
    Https://backbonejs.org/#View There is also a github repo that has examples of MVC patterns adapted to the web platform. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • React is 10 years old
    Got it thanks for the context. I've read the web app and it seems to me it is just https://backbonejs.org/ re-written in Typescript and allows JSX. I'm very certain Typescript and JSX will have improved the DX for Backbone like apps, but it doesn't address all of the other issues that teams had with Backbone. e.g. Cyclical event propagation, state stored in the DOM (i.e. Appendchild is error prone in large code... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Just Simply – Stop saying how simple things are in our docs
    Even further nowadays, docs are created using Docusaurus. I don't have problem with it but documentation should be good (eye) friendly than easy to write. Why not be creative while writing docs such as - Backbone.js - https://backbonejs.org Or https://backbonejs.org/docs/backbone.html as code annotation. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • The Emperor's New Library
    What we see, a decade ago, are that many of the "popular" libraries, frameworks, and methods, not surprisingly, have gone by the wayside, a lot that have remained in current code as difficult-to-removemodernize legacy cruft (Bower, Gulp, Grunt, Backbone, Angular 1, ...), and then we have the small minority that are still here. Some that remain have had their utility lessened/questioned by platform and language... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

UI Faces mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of UI Faces yet. Tracking of UI Faces recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Backbone.js and UI Faces, you can also consider the following products

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

This Person Does Not Exist - Computer generated people. Refresh to get a new one.

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

This Cat Does Not Exist - Computer generated cats. Refresh to get a new one.

ember.js - A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps

Generated.photos - Enhance your creative works with photos generated completely by AI. Search our gallery of high-quality diverse photos or create unique models by your parameters in real time

Loading...