Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Backbone.js VS Paths.js

Compare Backbone.js VS Paths.js and see what are their differences

Backbone.js logo Backbone.js

Give your JS App some Backbone with Models, Views, Collections, and Events

Paths.js logo Paths.js

Paths.js enables users to generate SVG paths for geometric shapes.
  • Backbone.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • Paths.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14

Backbone.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Backbone.js is minimal and lightweight, which means it has a small footprint and adds very little overhead to your project.
  • Flexibility
    Backbone.js provides a flexible structure to developers by allowing them to build their own MVC or MVP architectures using models, views, collections, and routers.
  • Ease of Integration
    Backbone.js can be easily integrated with other libraries and frameworks, such as jQuery or underscore.js, enhancing its capabilities without much difficulty.
  • Large Community
    Backbone.js has been around for a long time, resulting in a large community and a plethora of plugins and extensions that can be leveraged.
  • Detailed Documentation
    The official site offers comprehensive documentation which includes tutorials, examples, and a detailed API reference, aiding developers to understand and utilize the library efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Backbone.js

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    New developers might find Backbone.js difficult to learn due to its non-opinionated nature and lack of enforced structure.
  • Sparse In-Built Features
    Backbone.js provides only the basic building blocks, requiring developers to write more boilerplate code or rely on external libraries for additional functionalities.
  • Outdated
    As newer frameworks and libraries (like React, Vue, and Angular) have emerged with more robust features and better performance, Backbone.js has somewhat fallen out of favor in modern development practices.
  • Event Binding Complexity
    Managing event bindings in Backbone.js can become complex and sometimes messy in large applications, which can lead to difficult maintenance and debugging.
  • Limited Two-Way Data Binding
    Backbone.js does not provide two-way data binding out-of-the-box, unlike other frameworks such as Angular, necessitating additional code to sync views and models.

Paths.js features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Paths.js offers a straightforward approach to create and handle SVG paths, making it accessible for developers who need to produce vector graphics without extensive overhead.
  • Lightweight
    Being a small library, Paths.js adds minimal overhead to a project, making it suitable for applications where performance and speed are crucial.
  • Declarative Syntax
    The library allows users to define paths declaratively, which can improve code readability and maintainability.
  • Comprehensive Shape Support
    Paths.js supports a variety of shapes such as lines, arcs, and bezier curves out of the box, providing flexibility in creating complex graphics.

Possible disadvantages of Paths.js

  • Limited Community Support
    As a niche library, it may have a smaller user base compared to more popular graphics libraries, leading to fewer tutorials, examples, and community-contributed resources.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to more extensive libraries like D3.js, Paths.js may lack advanced features and tools for data visualization and complex animations.
  • Maintenance Concerns
    Depending on its update frequency, there might be concerns regarding the library’s maintenance and compatibility with future web standards and technologies.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with SVG path syntax, there may be an initial learning curve involved in effectively using Paths.js.

Backbone.js videos

Introduction to Backbone.js

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Backbone.js
  • Review - Backbone.js Code Review w Backbone.js Mentor Jonathon

Paths.js videos

No Paths.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Backbone.js and Paths.js)
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
0% 0
Charting Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
89 89%
11% 11
JS Library
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Backbone.js and Paths.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Backbone.js and Paths.js

Backbone.js Reviews

20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
A veteran on the scene, Backbone.js is all about giving structure to your JavaScript-heavy applications. It’s standing the test of time, enabling you to keep your data logic and display logic neatly side by side, all while being lightweight.
9 Best JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2023
Backbone.js is based on the Model View Controller (MVC) design pattern. The library supports seven components: Models, Views, Collections, Routers, Events, Sync, and Options. Backbone.js also provides an asynchronous communication layer that allows the application to communicate with a backend service.
Source: ninetailed.io
JavaScript: What Are The Most Used Frameworks For This Language?
Backbone.JS is a lightweight JavaScript library that provides a framework for developing structured and scalable web applications. It offers a set of tools for building client-side applications that interact with RESTful APIs. Backbone.JS is well-suited for developing single-page applications (SPAs) where most of the user interface is rendered in the browser, rather than...
Source: www.bocasay.com
20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Backbone.js is a JavaScript-based framework that connects to an API via a RESTful JSON interface. Backbone.js is known for being small and light because it only requires jQuery and one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, to use the entire library.
Top JavaScript Frameworks For Mobile App Development
Backbone JS is a JavaScript framework based on the MVP app design. As the name suggests, it acts as a strong backbone to your project. It is lightweight in nature and hence, is considered ideal for developing single-page applications. It offers a simplistic frontend and makes the best use of JavaScript functions.
Source: medium.com

Paths.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Paths.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Backbone.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Backbone.js mentions (17)

  • JavaScript Views, the Hard Way – A Pattern for Writing UI
    Https://backbonejs.org/#View There is also a github repo that has examples of MVC patterns adapted to the web platform. - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • React is 10 years old
    Got it thanks for the context. I've read the web app and it seems to me it is just https://backbonejs.org/ re-written in Typescript and allows JSX. I'm very certain Typescript and JSX will have improved the DX for Backbone like apps, but it doesn't address all of the other issues that teams had with Backbone. e.g. Cyclical event propagation, state stored in the DOM (i.e. Appendchild is error prone in large code... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Just Simply – Stop saying how simple things are in our docs
    Even further nowadays, docs are created using Docusaurus. I don't have problem with it but documentation should be good (eye) friendly than easy to write. Why not be creative while writing docs such as - Backbone.js - https://backbonejs.org Or https://backbonejs.org/docs/backbone.html as code annotation. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • The Emperor's New Library
    What we see, a decade ago, are that many of the "popular" libraries, frameworks, and methods, not surprisingly, have gone by the wayside, a lot that have remained in current code as difficult-to-removemodernize legacy cruft (Bower, Gulp, Grunt, Backbone, Angular 1, ...), and then we have the small minority that are still here. Some that remain have had their utility lessened/questioned by platform and language... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

Paths.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Paths.js yet. Tracking of Paths.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Backbone.js and Paths.js, you can also consider the following products

AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.

Snap.svg - Snap.svg is a javascript SVG library for the modern web.

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

ember.js - A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps

Shield UI Charts - JavaScript Chart Types - Our HTML5 and JavaScript chart is a fast, feature-rich data visualization control. It offers over 23 different chart types and flexible API for additional customization.