Bab.la VS dict.cc

Usually, I browse bab.la's Finnish pages for verbs. Example page for rakastaa. Source: over 1 year ago

Besides the dictionaries mentioned above, when it comes to online free editions I like https://bab.la/ - it gives you real examples and sentences as well, those can help a lot when it comes to translating. Source: over 1 year ago

I have been using Anki for a few months now and it has been a valuable asset in my language learning journey. But creating anki cards takes me so long and I wonder if there is a faster way to do it ? I usually use translation sites like bab.la or google translate. Source: over 1 year ago

Whenever I have to translate words from Dutch to English or the other way around I always use bab.la. It also gives you context examples which is great for knowing which word to use when a word has multple translations. Source: over 1 year ago

I am using google translate or bab.la and google translate says bland means among, bland annat means including. But when I translate the sentence it says "among other things, they will have to work longer every day and receive a lower salary". Source: almost 2 years ago

Anyway, dict.cc says sich anhören is nur unpersönlich. So, I guess I can't use it to describe people? Like, Sie hört sich seltsam an would be incorrect? Source: 6 months ago

So, I looked up excitement on dict.cc. It gave me...die Aufregung, die Begeisterung, die Spannung, die Erregung...which of these words would you all use for the general concept of "excitement?". Source: 7 months ago

In Scandinavian (Swedish for example), verb loanwords end in '-era', while in the very similar German language, verb loanwords end in '-ieren' (eg, das Auto zu parkieren). But you see, until a spelling reform in approx. 1907, the spelling was '-iren'. LEO doesn't have 'assentieren', but dict.cc does. However, these two Websites I named are really wordlists, not dictionaries. Source: 10 months ago

You can use the vocab trainer on dict.cc. Source: 12 months ago

I thought this word would also exist in English, maybe with a little difference at best. My translator (dict.cc) recommends autarkic, autarkical (both with 'k', surprisingly) and autarchic. But my online spellchecker here underlines all of them with a red line. Source: 12 months ago