Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Azure Web App for Containers VS jHipster

Compare Azure Web App for Containers VS jHipster and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Azure Web App for Containers logo Azure Web App for Containers

Bring your own containers and deploy to App Service as a web app running on Linux in seconds using Web App for Containers feature of Azure App Service.

jHipster logo jHipster

JHipster is a development platform to quickly generate, develop, & deploy modern web applications & microservice architectures.
  • Azure Web App for Containers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-16
  • jHipster Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-25

Azure Web App for Containers features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

jHipster features and specs

  • Rapid Development
    jHipster accelerates the development process by generating a full application stack with a frontend, backend, and necessary configurations in a matter of minutes.
  • Wide Technology Stack
    It supports a variety of modern technologies including Spring Boot, Angular, React, and Vue, giving developers flexibility in their tech choices.
  • Best Practices
    The generated code follows industry best practices for security, scalability, and maintainability, reducing the risk of common pitfalls.
  • Microservices Support
    jHipster provides robust support for microservices architectures, including service discovery, API gateway, and containerization.
  • Active Community
    jHipster has a large and active community which means frequent updates, rich documentation, and abundant third-party tutorials and plugins.
  • Customization
    The generated code is highly customizable, allowing developers to easily modify and extend the generated boilerplate to fit their specific requirements.
  • Integrated Tooling
    It comes with integrated tools like JUnit for testing, Liquibase for database versioning, and Maven/Gradle for build automation.

Possible disadvantages of jHipster

  • Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with the technologies used by jHipster, there can be a steep learning curve before getting productive.
  • Complexity
    The generated applications can be complex, making it harder to understand and maintain the codebase, especially for small projects or teams.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing the numerous dependencies that come with a jHipster project can become cumbersome, leading to potential version conflicts.
  • Overhead
    The inclusion of many features by default can introduce unnecessary overhead, potentially impacting performance and resource usage.
  • Customization Effort
    While customization is possible, it may require significant effort to deviate from the standard patterns and configurations provided by jHipster.
  • Tooling Fragmentation
    Using a wide array of tools and libraries can create fragmentation, leading to challenges in unified project management and deployment.

Azure Web App for Containers videos

No Azure Web App for Containers videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

jHipster videos

+ Add

Code One Preview: Spring Boot, Angular, JHipster, OAUTH, OIDC

More videos:

  • Review - Jhipster private reserves part TWO
  • Review - Java Microservices Made Easy with JHipster, Istio, and Kubernetes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Web App for Containers and jHipster)

Azure Web App for Containers

jHipster

Developer Tools
14 14%
Developer Tools
86% 86
Software Development
0 0%
Software Development
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Web App for Containers and jHipster. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Azure Web App for Containers and jHipster

Azure Web App for Containers Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Web App for Containers yet.
Be the first one to post

jHipster Reviews

17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
Spring Boot allows you to create production-grade Spring-based applications that work with minimal configuration. JHipster combines this with Angular, React, Vue, and Bootstrap on the client side to provide you with a full-stack architecture. If you want to see how a JHipster app looks in real life, check out the sample apps for Angular, React, and Vue, created by the...
Source: raygun.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Web App for Containers seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Web App for Containers mentions (3)

  • Where do I find the output log of TelemetryClient.TrackEvent() when using Azure ApplicationInsights?
    Some additional background info: I have a .NET 6 Worker Service app which is deployed to Azure in a Docker container running under an AppService Web App for Containers. Microsoft has a separate NuGet package for ApplicationInsights, Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.WorkerService, when deploying this type of app and I followed the corresponding documentation here: Application Insights for Worker Service applications... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Choosing Between AWS Lambda and Docker
    By contrast, Docker is pretty much a de facto standard. A Docker container that works on AWS's ECS will also run on Azure App Service, Google Cloud Run, and Kubernetes. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Containers in the Cloud: What Are Your Options?
    Azure Web App allows you to deploy containers on the service using container images from Docker Hub or Azure Container Registry. The backend OS patching, capacity management, and load balancing of services are handled by the platform, and the service enables on-demand scaling, either through scale-up or scale-out options based on configured scaling rules. This also helps with cost management, where costs are... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

jHipster mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of jHipster yet. Tracking of jHipster recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Web App for Containers and jHipster, you can also consider the following products

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

Google Kubernetes Engine - Google Kubernetes Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Set up a cluster in minutes.

Cloud Foundry - Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service, providing a choice of clouds, developer frameworks and application services, making it faster and easier to build, test, deploy and scale applications from an IDE or the command line.

OpenXava - OpenXava is a Web Java Framework for Rapid Development of Enterprise Applications.

AWS Fargate - AWS Fargate is a compute engine for Amazon ECS and EKS that allows you to run containers without having to manage servers or clusters.

Telosys - Telosys is a lightweight Open Source code generator. Telosys allows to generate any kind of language (Java, Python, GoLang, PHP, JavaScript, TypeScript, C#, etc). It works without UML model. All the code generation templates are customizable.

Loading...