Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Web App for Containers VS Google Cloud Run

Compare Azure Web App for Containers VS Google Cloud Run and see what are their differences

Azure Web App for Containers logo Azure Web App for Containers

Bring your own containers and deploy to App Service as a web app running on Linux in seconds using Web App for Containers feature of Azure App Service.

Google Cloud Run logo Google Cloud Run

Bringing serverless to containers
  • Azure Web App for Containers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-16
  • Google Cloud Run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16

Azure Web App for Containers features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Google Cloud Run features and specs

  • Scalability
    Google Cloud Run automatically scales the number of container instances based on incoming requests, ensuring optimal resource usage and performance.
  • Ease of Use
    Cloud Run makes it simple to deploy and manage containers, with minimal configuration required. The platform supports popular languages and frameworks.
  • Serverless
    Cloud Run abstracts away server management, letting you focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure provisioning or maintenance.
  • Cost-Effective
    Customers only pay for the exact resources they use, thanks to per-request billing, making it a cost-effective option for variable workloads.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery, Cloud Pub/Sub, and Google Kubernetes Engine enhances functionality and data handling capabilities.
  • Custom Domains and SSL
    Cloud Run offers support for custom domains and automatically manages SSL/TLS certificates, ensuring secure communication for your services.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Run

  • Cold Starts
    Due to its serverless nature, Cloud Run can experience latency during cold starts, which may impact performance for time-sensitive applications.
  • Limited Execution Time
    There is a maximum request timeout of 15 minutes, which may not be suitable for long-running processes or tasks that require extended execution time.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    Although cost-effective for many use cases, the pricing model can be complex and may require careful cost management and monitoring to avoid unexpected expenses.
  • Limited Regional Availability
    Cloud Run may not be available in all regions, which can limit its use for applications requiring specific geographic distribution or compliance with regional regulations.
  • Dependency on Containerization
    Cloud Run requires applications to be containerized, which might necessitate additional effort for those not already familiar with Docker or other container technologies.
  • No Stateful Processing
    Being a stateless platform, Cloud Run is not ideal for applications requiring persistent state between requests, potentially necessitating additional services (e.g., databases) to manage state.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Web App for Containers and Google Cloud Run)
Developer Tools
11 11%
89% 89
Cloud Computing
8 8%
92% 92
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Web App for Containers and Google Cloud Run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Azure Web App for Containers and Google Cloud Run

Azure Web App for Containers Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Web App for Containers yet.
Be the first one to post

Google Cloud Run Reviews

Top 12 Kubernetes Alternatives to Choose From in 2023
So if anyone is looking for a flexible and cost-efficient platform for running containers on Google Cloud, then Google Cloud Run is great.
Source: humalect.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Run seems to be a lot more popular than Azure Web App for Containers. While we know about 89 links to Google Cloud Run, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Azure Web App for Containers. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Web App for Containers mentions (3)

  • Where do I find the output log of TelemetryClient.TrackEvent() when using Azure ApplicationInsights?
    Some additional background info: I have a .NET 6 Worker Service app which is deployed to Azure in a Docker container running under an AppService Web App for Containers. Microsoft has a separate NuGet package for ApplicationInsights, Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.WorkerService, when deploying this type of app and I followed the corresponding documentation here: Application Insights for Worker Service applications... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Choosing Between AWS Lambda and Docker
    By contrast, Docker is pretty much a de facto standard. A Docker container that works on AWS's ECS will also run on Azure App Service, Google Cloud Run, and Kubernetes. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Containers in the Cloud: What Are Your Options?
    Azure Web App allows you to deploy containers on the service using container images from Docker Hub or Azure Container Registry. The backend OS patching, capacity management, and load balancing of services are handled by the platform, and the service enables on-demand scaling, either through scale-up or scale-out options based on configured scaling rules. This also helps with cost management, where costs are... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

Google Cloud Run mentions (89)

  • Comparing Prices: AWS Fargate vs Azure Container Apps vs Google Cloud Run
    AWS Fargate, Google Cloud Run and Azure Container Apps offer services to deploy containers serverless in the cloud. The three providers are the biggest in the industry, but how do their prices compare? One thing all 3 providers have in common: Their pricing is pretty complicated and it can be hard to keep the overview. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Google Cloud Run vs Sliplane - Comparison of two container hosting services
    Google Cloud Run (GCR) and Sliplane both simplify deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications. However, there are some key differences, and both platforms serve different users and use cases. Let's compare them side by side. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Why aren't we all serverless yet?
    >Something I’m still having trouble believing is that complex workflows are going to move to e.g. AWS Lambda rather than stateless containers orchestrated by e.g. Amazon EKS. I think 0-1 it makes sense, but operating/scaling efficiently seems hard. […] This isn't really saying anything about serverless though. The issue here is not with serverless but that Lambda wants you to break up your server into multiple... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Top 8 Docker Alternatives to Consider in 2025
    Google Cloud Run offers a serverless platform for running containers, providing automatic scaling and management of containerized applications. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Day 3: What is Docker and why should I care?
    Most cloud platforms support Docker containers. Sliplane, Fly.io, AWS, Google Cloud, etc. This means that you can easily switch between cloud providers if you want to, without having to change your software. If you ever migrated from one cloud provider to another, you probably know how much work this can be. With Docker, you can just take your container image and run it on the new platform. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Web App for Containers and Google Cloud Run, you can also consider the following products

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Cloud Foundry - Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service, providing a choice of clouds, developer frameworks and application services, making it faster and easier to build, test, deploy and scale applications from an IDE or the command line.

Fission.io - Fission.io is a serverless framework for Kubernetes that supports many concepts such as event triggers, parallel execution, and statelessness.

AWS Fargate - AWS Fargate is a compute engine for Amazon ECS and EKS that allows you to run containers without having to manage servers or clusters.

Spot.io - Build web, mobile and IoT applications using AWS Lambda and API Gateway, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions, and more.