Azure Media Services VS Mux

The figure below depicts a sample cloud based workflow based on Microsoft’s Azure Media Services. Source: almost 2 years ago

> Is there really no other competitor or company that tried to tackle this problem in the past? Microsoft and Google already have very mature offerings in this space. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/media-services/#getting-started. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

How are you storing/serving the videos? You might look at a service like mux.com which both hosts files behind a CDN but optimizes video delivery with adaptive bitrate streaming. If you are serving whole/raw video files off Cloudfront that could impact your costs. Source: 10 months ago

Vimeo is a solid platform. Most alternatives you'll find searching for "vimeo vs." are just marketing / billing wrappers around the mux.com streaming platform. If you are somewhat technically inclined you can use mux.com directly and embed it on your website yourself. Source: about 1 year ago

Feels like there's no real alternative to Youtube since they have large enough capital to run the site to be barely able to break even. Feels like something like https://mux.com would meet the purpose jut feels like free streaming is way too costly. Source: about 1 year ago

The repo is unmaintained, ever since Matt moved from Twitch to mux.com, so the library does need a maintainer. There are some bugs and PRs that could do with merging to head, but it is generally functional, with some quirks. The code is used in both OBS and Gstreamer Rust bindings. Source: about 1 year ago

So Senja uses Mux under the hood for video storage and streaming. It's an amazing solution! Source: over 1 year ago