Azure Media Services VS api.video

The figure below depicts a sample cloud based workflow based on Microsoft’s Azure Media Services. Source: almost 2 years ago

> Is there really no other competitor or company that tried to tackle this problem in the past? Microsoft and Google already have very mature offerings in this space. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/media-services/#getting-started. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

I'm currently working on a mobile project that involves watching video content. I switched from using static .mp4 files to HLS video-on-demand streaming with adaptive bitrates - that way the videos should watchable even though users have bad connection speed. I have managed that setup through hosting vidoes on api.video, which gives you a link to the HLS stream. Source: about 1 year ago

Here is our website : https://api.video We are looking for talented GO/PHP developer to join our Api team. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

You said Vimeo is not working out for you (hard to believe Vimeo is the cause of your issues and not you). So alternatively then, your best bet is to use Mux.com, Cloudflare Stream, or api.video. They are all kind of similar but specialize in handling streaming video. You will still pay out the nose. Streaming video is expensive in general. Source: over 1 year ago

Api. Video is one of the fastest-growing startups in the industry. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

With the recent shift in the popularity of remote work environments, the demand for live streaming services has increased. Even prior to the shift, many global companies have used livestreaming services for their organization’s all-hands meetings. api.video provides APIs and SDKs that make it easier to build your own livestreaming service and host it on your website. Additionally, they also provide solutions for... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago