How are you storing/serving the videos? You might look at a service like mux.com which both hosts files behind a CDN but optimizes video delivery with adaptive bitrate streaming. If you are serving whole/raw video files off Cloudfront that could impact your costs. Source: 10 months ago
Vimeo is a solid platform. Most alternatives you'll find searching for "vimeo vs." are just marketing / billing wrappers around the mux.com streaming platform. If you are somewhat technically inclined you can use mux.com directly and embed it on your website yourself. Source: about 1 year ago
Feels like there's no real alternative to Youtube since they have large enough capital to run the site to be barely able to break even. Feels like something like https://mux.com would meet the purpose jut feels like free streaming is way too costly. Source: about 1 year ago
The repo is unmaintained, ever since Matt moved from Twitch to mux.com, so the library does need a maintainer. There are some bugs and PRs that could do with merging to head, but it is generally functional, with some quirks. The code is used in both OBS and Gstreamer Rust bindings. Source: about 1 year ago
So Senja uses Mux under the hood for video storage and streaming. It's an amazing solution! Source: over 1 year ago
So it's not that hard to do a good job of it, but it is work, and it's work with diminishing returns if you're not comfortable managing the lift and it might require some experimentation here and there to get exactly what you want out of it. The HLS spec is readily available and ffmpeg can, given a video input, emit an HLS manifest with a set of renditions. (For research purposes, the magic words are... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
In this article, you’ll learn what a headless CMS is and how to build a video streaming application using Next.js as your frontend, Strapi as your headless CMS, and a service called Mux that allows you to serve up videos via an API to your application. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Surprised nobody mentioned Mux yet, who are really great at providing a video platform for all sorts of apps and businesses: https://mux.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Rewriting a project is never a good approach considering the opportunity cost. I evaluated a few offerings: mux.com, Cloudflare Stream, Amazon IVS. On paper, they have all the building blocks we need. In addition, some have features like video analytics, policing/signing playback URL, which would be useful for us. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
This could be an interesting competitor to Mux (https://mux.com/). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Api.video and mux.com are both solutions for streaming. I have experience with both and which to pick comes down to your long-term use case because they handle encoding differently. Source: over 2 years ago
I use Cloudinary for images and Mux for video, in some cases Vimeo (more for brochure websites that want their promo video smack in the middle of their website. Hey it's money.). Source: over 2 years ago
We actually built How Video Works as a side project at Mux [1] (inspired by How DNS Works [2]) - there's a note about it at the top of the page. We have contributions from our own team as well as others in the industry. Our main motivation is to try to educate on the complexities and intracies of streaming video. Despite streaming video representing 80+% of the internet, it's all underpinned by a fairly small... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
From what I know implementing HLS on the backend is really difficult, and when I have implemented HLS I've used https://mux.com/ or https://cloudinary.com/ to process the source mp4s to the correct HLS video format and serve it. Both have guides to setting up HLS on their platform, but in my experience mux was less painful. Source: over 2 years ago
Hi, mux.com is a great service, but very expensive since it's a server solution. I can't use that. Source: over 2 years ago
Nothing against Vimeo, but was Mux (https://mux.com) also a consideration? - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I was looking at video on demand with mux.com or AWS but it seems like overkill. Source: over 2 years ago
I wanted to do better and after some research discovered Mux. I liked their developer-centric model and their pricing plan comes with $20 free credit. Considering I only have one video, it was effectively free for me. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Yes, the best API I know of for handling more than just a simple upload is from https://mux.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
What about something like https://mux.com ? Source: over 2 years ago
I recently come acros mux from what I can tell this API is going to make it super easy for no code tools to able to support video upload and playback ? Source: over 2 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Mux to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Mux. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.