Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Azure Kubernetes Service VS GlusterFS

Compare Azure Kubernetes Service VS GlusterFS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Azure Kubernetes Service logo Azure Kubernetes Service

Learn the features and benefits of Azure Kubernetes Service to deploy and manage container-based applications in Azure.

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.
  • Azure Kubernetes Service Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-15
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10

Azure Kubernetes Service features and specs

  • Managed Kubernetes
    Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a managed Kubernetes service, which reduces the complexity and operational overhead of managing Kubernetes by offloading much of that responsibility to Azure.
  • Integrated DevOps Tools
    AKS integrates seamlessly with Azure DevOps and other continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools, facilitating smooth development and deployment cycles.
  • Scalability
    AKS provides excellent scalability, allowing users to easily scale their applications up or down based on demand without worrying about the underlying architecture.
  • Security and Compliance
    Azure offers strong security features, such as integration with Azure Active Directory, role-based access control (RBAC), and network policies, which help ensure the security and compliance of applications within AKS.
  • Cost Management
    Only pay for the virtual machines and storage resources used, and no additional charge is levied for the Kubernetes management infrastructure, which can help manage and optimize costs effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Kubernetes Service

  • Complexity
    Even though AKS is a managed service, Kubernetes itself is inherently complex and can have a steep learning curve for teams not familiar with its concepts.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Using AKS means committing to Azure’s ecosystem, which could pose challenges if you decide to switch cloud providers or adopt multi-cloud strategies in the future.
  • Service Availability
    As with any cloud-based service, the availability of AKS is subject to Microsoft's uptime guarantees and regional availability, which may not meet all business continuity requirements.
  • Limited Customization
    Being a managed service, AKS might offer limited customization options compared to a self-managed Kubernetes, where you have complete control over the environment configurations.
  • Dependency on Azure Services
    Fully leveraging AKS might involve using other Azure services like Azure Monitor, Azure Policy, or Azure Security Center, which can increase complexity and dependency on the Azure ecosystem.

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

Azure Kubernetes Service videos

How to build and deploy a containerized app to Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) | Azure Friday

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Kubernetes Service and GlusterFS)
Containers As A Service
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Kubernetes Service and GlusterFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Azure Kubernetes Service and GlusterFS

Azure Kubernetes Service Reviews

11 Best Rancher Alternatives Multi Cluster Orchestration Platform
Azure Kubernetes Service is a fully managed container orchestration service based on Kubernetes. However, unlike GKE, AKS doesn’t attract cluster management, control plane, and master node fee. Instead, you have to pay for the network resources and the worker nodes, making it quite cost-effective.

GlusterFS Reviews

We have no reviews of GlusterFS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Kubernetes Service should be more popular than GlusterFS. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Kubernetes Service mentions (4)

  • Time to move on to Day 2 cloud operations
    On Day 1, it may be ok to take traditional architectures (such as manually maintaining VMs), but on Day 2 it is time to take the full benefit of cloud-native services. The easiest way is to replace any manual maintenance of infrastructure with managed services – in most cases, switching to a managed database, storage, or even load-balancers and API gateways, will provide a lot of benefits (such as lower... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • The Container Orchestration vs Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) Debate
    Containers are very popular in many organizations (from small startups to large enterprises), and today organizations have many alternatives for running containers – from Amazon ECS, Azure Container Apps, and Google Cloud Run, to managed Kubernetes services such as Amazon EKS, Azure AKS, and Google GKE. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • The 2024 Web Hosting Report
    Docker swarm still exists, it still works, and some of these other container orchestrators are still hanging on, but for the most part, you’re using Kubernetes if you’re doing this stuff at work. Generally it's well-understood that kubernetes is hard to get right, and so most people use it via a managed provider like Elastic Kubernetes Service from AWS, Azure Kubernetes Service from MSFT, or Google Kubernetes... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Azure Containers Services: Pricing and Feature Comparison
    Azure Kubernetes Service – AKS is a managed Kubernetes service for running containerized applications with advanced and highly customizable orchestration functionality. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Kubernetes Service and GlusterFS, you can also consider the following products

Google Kubernetes Engine - Google Kubernetes Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Set up a cluster in minutes.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

Oracle Container Engine - Reduce the time and cost to build modern cloud native applications. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure provides Container Engine for Kubernetes as a free service that runs on higher-performance, lower-cost compute shapes.

rkt - App Container runtime

Alibaba Cloud Container Service - Container Service for Kubernetes provides flexible management of Kubernetes containerized applications.

Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.