Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Azure Functions VS ASP.NET MVC

Compare Azure Functions VS ASP.NET MVC and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Azure Functions logo Azure Functions

Azure Functions is a serverless event driven experience that extends the existing Azure App Service platform.

ASP.NET MVC logo ASP.NET MVC

Download ASP.NET MVC and learn how to build web apps using the model view controller pattern.
  • Azure Functions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-26
  • ASP.NET MVC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26

Azure Functions features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure Functions offers automatic scaling based on demand, which means it can handle varying workloads without manual adjustments.
  • Cost-effective
    With its consumption-based pricing model, you only pay for the compute resources used during function execution, making it cost-effective for many scenarios.
  • Simplified Development
    Developers can focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure management, including server provisioning and maintenance.
  • Multiple Language Support
    Azure Functions supports a wide range of programming languages, including C#, JavaScript, Python, and more, offering flexibility for developers.
  • Integration with Azure Services
    Azure Functions seamlessly integrates with other Azure services like Cosmos DB, Blob Storage, and Event Hubs, enabling the creation of complex workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Functions

  • Cold Start Latency
    Functions in a serverless environment can experience latency during initial invocation after being dormant, which might impact performance for time-sensitive applications.
  • Execution Timeout
    Azure Functions have a maximum execution timeout, which can be limiting for long-running processes and might require architectural adjustments.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Leveraging Azure-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it difficult to migrate to other cloud platforms without significant refactoring.
  • Limited Debugging and Monitoring
    Debugging Azure Functions can be less straightforward compared to traditional applications, with constraints in local debugging and monitoring capabilities.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    The pricing model can become complex, especially for applications with unpredictable workloads, making it challenging to estimate costs accurately.

ASP.NET MVC features and specs

  • Separation of Concerns
    ASP.NET MVC enforces a clear separation between the model, view, and controller components, which helps in managing and structuring code more efficiently.
  • Testability
    The framework is inherently testable due to its separation of concerns and design pattern, facilitating unit testing of both the controllers and business logic.
  • Extensibility
    ASP.NET MVC is highly extensible, allowing developers to customize components like routing, view engines, serialization, and others as per their needs.
  • Powerful Routing
    The framework provides a powerful and flexible URL routing system that makes it easy to create SEO-friendly URLs.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    Developers can leverage the rich .NET ecosystem, utilizing libraries, tools, and third-party extensions that are compatible with ASP.NET.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET MVC

  • Complexity for Small Applications
    For smaller applications, the overhead of setting up and maintaining the MVC structure might be more complex than necessary.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Developers coming from a WebForms background or without MVC experience might find the ASP.NET MVC framework more challenging to learn initially.
  • Lacks Built-in Controls
    Unlike ASP.NET WebForms, ASP.NET MVC does not provide a wide range of built-in server controls, which can increase the time to develop certain UI components.
  • Heavy on Convention
    The framework is built heavily on conventions, which might not appeal to developers who prefer configuration over convention.

Azure Functions videos

+ Add

How to build a movie review app with Azure Cosmos DB and Azure Functions | Azure Makers Series

More videos:

  • Review - Go serverless: Event-driven applications with Azure Functions | Azure Friday
  • Review - Azure Friday | Serverless Apps with Azure Cosmos DB and Azure Functions

ASP.NET MVC videos

+ Add

Step-by-step ASP.NET MVC Tutorial for Beginners | Mosh

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to ASP.NET MVC in C#: Basics, Advanced Topics, Tips, Tricks, Best Practices, and More

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Azure Functions and ASP.NET MVC)

Azure Functions

ASP.NET MVC

Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Azure Functions and ASP.NET MVC. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Azure Functions and ASP.NET MVC

Azure Functions Reviews

Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Azure Functions is particularly useful for developers working with .NET technologies or those already using Azure services.
Source: signoz.io

ASP.NET MVC Reviews

We have no reviews of ASP.NET MVC yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Functions should be more popular than ASP.NET MVC. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Azure Functions mentions (3)

  • Manage serverless APIs with Apache APISIX
    This article shows with the simple example how to manage Java-based serverless APIs build with Azure functions. It uses azure-functions plugin to integrate Apache APISIX API Gateway with Azure Serverless Function that invokes the HTTP trigger functions and return the response from Azure Cloud. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • The Power of GitHub Actions for Streamlining DevOps Workflows
    GitHub Actions for Azure: This GitHub Action allows developers to automate tasks on the Microsoft Azure platform. With this action, developers can easily integrate Azure services into their workflows, such as Azure Functions, App Services, and Kubernetes. This can help streamline DevOps workflows by automating tasks such as deployment, testing, and scaling on the Azure platform. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • NoOps: What Does the Future Hold for DevOps Engineers?
    NoOps is best suited for born-in-the-cloud environments that leverage PaaS and serverless solutions. Microservices and API-based application architectures fit the bill perfectly, as they offer fine-grained modularity along with automation. Leading cloud service providers like AWS, Azure, and GCP have a laser focus on providing more services and capabilities in PaaS and serverless, which would help accelerate the... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

ASP.NET MVC mentions (2)

  • ELI5: .NET ecosystem & equivalents
    IMO, .NET's strength is Web API. If you're wanting to build user interfaces, go with Next, Nuxt or Sveltekit. If you want to build user interfaces with .NET, go with ASP.NET MVC. Source: about 2 years ago
  • OWASP Top Ten and Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
    After processing the entries, the analyzer concludes that they are all related to various versions of a product with the name "asp.net_model_view_controller" released by a company called Microsoft. All these entries correspond to a vulnerability with the CVE-2014-4075 identifier. However, the library in which the vulnerability was discovered is called "System.Web.Mvc". Most likely we'll get this name from the list... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Azure Functions and ASP.NET MVC, you can also consider the following products

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Google App Engine - A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Now Platform - Get native platform intelligence, so you can predict, prioritize, and proactively manage the work that matters most with the NOW Platform from ServiceNow.

CodeIgniter - A Fully Baked PHP Framework

Loading...