Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: about 1 year ago

​To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: over 1 year ago

I have a client that (finally!) decided to go all-in on Azure; I had prepared the owner to expect additional costs based on their need for a file share -- I was expecting to have to use Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago

I agree with the SharePoint, though another option would be Azure Files. Source: almost 2 years ago

Do you think that Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive is good for digital preservation of my ~300GB video stash? Source: 11 months ago

Easy - I know about S3 Glaciers but I'd prefer something that doesn't require going through a number of tutorials to use. Source: about 1 year ago

The nice thing about AWS is that you could use Amazon S3 Glacier storage if you can live with slower retrieval (5-12 hours). It's really cheap and excellent for non-changing requirements which would be good for media that isn't updating regularly. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. Source: about 1 year ago

I would recommend Amazon S3 Glacier https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ . You can explicitly upload files there via web interface or many 3rd party clients. You can also upload to more than one geographical location. Source: over 1 year ago

What you want, is Amazon Glacier. You're not talking about Backup here, you're talking about Archival. Source: over 1 year ago