Docker Registry: A Docker registry is a repository that stores Docker images such as Docker Hub. You can also set up private registries to store your custom Docker images securely on the main cloud service providers such as Google Cloud Container Registry, Azure Container registry. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

One of the great things about Bicep is that it allows you to split it up in smaller modules that can be easily referenced from another Bicep file. This increases readability of your files and also allows for easier reuse of these modules. When you want to reference the same module in different repositories there are a couple of ways to do this. One of them is by using a Bicep Registry. For this you can use Azure... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

A container registry is a service to store and maintain images. Container registries can be either public, allowing any user to download the public images, or private, requiring user authentication to manage the images. Examples of Container Registries include but are not limited to: Docker Hub, Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR), and Microsoft Azure Container Registry. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

In Azure, AWS, GCP, and other clouds, there are also container registries. If you’re embedded into a specific public cloud, it wouldn’t hurt to use those container registries. Azure has Container Registry, AWS has Elastic Container Registry (ECR), and GCP has Container Registry. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

A private container registry for container images like Azure Container Registry. Source: about 2 years ago

Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: about 1 year ago

​To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: over 1 year ago

I have a client that (finally!) decided to go all-in on Azure; I had prepared the owner to expect additional costs based on their need for a file share -- I was expecting to have to use Azure Files. Source: over 1 year ago

I agree with the SharePoint, though another option would be Azure Files. Source: almost 2 years ago