Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Axure RP VS Purecss

Compare Axure RP VS Purecss and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Axure RP logo Axure RP

The prototyping and specification software used by 87% of the Fortune 100. Beyond mockups, design interactive prototypes for business solutions, websites, and applications.

Purecss logo Purecss

A set of small, responsive CSS modules that you can use in every web project.
  • Axure RP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-14
  • Purecss Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-18

Axure RP features and specs

  • Advanced Prototyping
    Axure RP allows detailed and functional prototypes with complex interactions, making it suitable for high-fidelity prototyping.
  • Collaboration Features
    Axure RP includes robust collaboration tools, enabling multiple team members to work together efficiently.
  • Extensive Widget Library
    The extensive library of built-in widgets and components helps speed up the prototyping process.
  • Conditional Logic
    It supports conditional logic, which enables the creation of dynamic and responsive prototypes.
  • Responsive Design
    Axure RP provides tools to create responsive designs that adapt to different screen sizes.
  • Flexible Publishing Options
    Prototypes can be easily published and shared online, making it accessible for user testing and stakeholder reviews.
  • Documentation Capabilities
    Axure RP allows the generation of detailed specifications and documentation directly from the prototypes.

Possible disadvantages of Axure RP

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find Axure challenging to learn due to the complexity of its features and interface.
  • Cost
    Axure RP is relatively expensive compared to some other prototyping tools, potentially limiting access for smaller teams or startups.
  • Heavy Software
    The software can be resource-intensive, requiring high-performance hardware to run smoothly, especially for larger projects.
  • Limited Visual Design Capabilities
    While excellent for interaction design, Axure is not as strong in visual design and may need to be complemented with other design tools.
  • Proprietary Format
    Prototypes created in Axure are saved in a proprietary format, which can complicate sharing and compatibility with other tools.

Purecss features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Pure.css is extremely lightweight, under 4KB when minified and gzipped, which makes it very fast to load.
  • Responsive
    Pure.css comes with a set of responsive design modules that can be easily integrated, ensuring that your web pages look good on all devices.
  • Modular
    The library is modular, meaning you can include only the parts that you need, which keeps your project lean.
  • Easy Integration
    Pure.css can be easily dropped into existing projects without much hassle, allowing for quick and effective styling.
  • Customization
    Pure.css is designed to be easily customizable, enabling developers to tweak the styles to fit their project's needs.
  • CSS Vanilla Approach
    Pure.css sticks to a vanilla CSS approach, making it easy for developers who are familiar with standard CSS.

Possible disadvantages of Purecss

  • Limited Components
    It offers fewer UI components compared to more comprehensive frameworks like Bootstrap or Foundation.
  • Basic Design
    The default styles are minimalistic, which may not meet the aesthetic requirements for more visually rich applications without additional customization.
  • Lack of JavaScript Utilities
    Pure.css focuses strictly on CSS, providing no JavaScript utilities or plugins for additional functionality.
  • Community Size
    The community around Pure.css is smaller compared to more popular frameworks, which means there are fewer third-party resources and extensions available.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    While basic usage is simple, customizing Pure.css to fit specific needs may require a deeper understanding of CSS.

Analysis of Axure RP

Overall verdict

  • Axure RP is considered a strong choice for UI/UX professionals who need to produce comprehensive and dynamic prototypes. Its robust feature set makes it particularly valuable for complex projects where detailed functionality needs to be demonstrated and tested early in the design process.

Why this product is good

  • Axure RP is a powerful and versatile tool for creating prototypes, wireframes, and design specifications. It allows designers and developers to create highly interactive and realistic prototypes without coding. The tool supports detailed documentation and collaboration, making it ideal for large projects and teams. Its ability to integrate with other design tools and its support for complex conditional logic and dynamic content are often highlighted as strong points.

Recommended for

  • Professional UI/UX designers
  • Product managers needing to communicate design ideas
  • Developers who require precise design specifications
  • Teams that require a collaborative prototyping tool
  • Projects requiring complex interactions and dynamic content

Analysis of Purecss

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PureCSS is good, especially for certain use-cases.

Why this product is good

  • PureCSS is lightweight and designed with a minimalistic approach, which makes it a great choice for developers who are looking for a simple and easy-to-use framework. It provides a responsive grid and modules for common web design needs without the bloat of larger frameworks.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need a lightweight and fast-loading CSS framework.
  • Projects that require responsive design but not an abundance of pre-designed components.
  • Beginners who want to learn about CSS frameworks with a simple and minimalistic tool.
  • Teams looking for modularity, as PureCSS allows selective inclusion of features.

Axure RP videos

Axure RP 9 Beta - Thoughts, Impressions and kinda a Review from a design lead

More videos:

  • Review - Getting started with Axure Prototyping | Axure RP: Noob to Master Ep1

Purecss videos

CSS Flexbox layout with inline-block fallback using PureCSS grids

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Axure RP and Purecss)
Prototyping
100 100%
0% 0
CSS Framework
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
71 71%
29% 29
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Axure RP and Purecss. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Axure RP and Purecss

Axure RP Reviews

Top 6 Figma Alternatives: Prototyping and UI/UX Tools
Axure provides 3 plans: Axure RP 9 Pro: $495 per user for a permanent license, or $29 per user per month. Axure RP 9 Team: $895 per user for a permanent license or $49 per monthly user.
Source: fronty.com
Figma Alternatives: 12 Prototyping and Design Tools in 2024
Like Adobe XD, Axure RP is another versatile tool that allows you to build advanced prototypes with collaboration tools to make it one of the most preferred design tools today.
10 Best Adobe XD Alternatives (Free & Paid)
Axure RP is a popular desktop application for UX designers to create interactive HTML prototypes for mobile, desktop, and web applications. RP (Rapid Prototyping) is the core focus of the tool and lets you design prototypes from just rough ideas. You can also use the tool to create personas, sitemaps, user workflows, customer journey maps, and wireframes. With an easy-to-use...

Purecss Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
Pure.css offers a set of small, responsive CSS modules that you can use in every project. These include grids, menus, buttons, tables, and other essential components. Despite its minimalistic design, Pure.css works well with other libraries such as Normalize.css, and can be used alongside any JavaScript library or framework.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Pure is a lightweight CSS framework like Bootstrap and a Bootstrap competitor designed with a mobile-first approach. Built on Normalize.css, it provides styling and design to native HTML components, as well as the most popular UI elements.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Pure.css is a CSS framework bunch of CSS modules clustered together. The crux of Pure lies in its weight. It is incredibly lightweight, as it has been crafted keeping mobile devices in mind, in which a small file size is imperative. The framework is purely CSS in nature, doing justice to its name.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
At only 3.7 KB minified, Pure is the most compact CSS Framework around. Out of all the CSS frameworks, Pure will help you create awesome CSS Code without sacrificing space. You can add pure-min.css through free unpkg CDN in your code to use Pure. You can also install Pure using a package manager like npm, Grunt, etc.
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
We consider Pure a minimalist alternative to Bootstrap that offers every module a beginner needs (navigation menu, grid, tables, etc.).

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Purecss seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Axure RP mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Axure RP yet. Tracking of Axure RP recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Purecss mentions (9)

  • Rapidly build efficient sites with Neat, the minimalist CSS framework
    Neat lacks a header and navigation; this by design, and may be enough for simple sites. If you want more capability, Pure.css is good to try too https://purecss.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • CSS framework for Dioxus + mobile
    I found Pure.css and it looks nice but maybe there is something better? Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is a website built completely on HTML, CSS and JS enough?
    Some examples: - https://simplecss.org/ - https://purecss.io/ (I've used this one for over a decade and works great). Source: over 2 years ago
  • CSP nonce with Node.js and EJS
    Now, to test our CSP, we just have to load some external resources. Let's bring on Pure.css and Lodash. Update index.ejs to look like this :. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Bootstrap vs Tailwind
    Personally I don't like either. Bootstrap seems too bloated and cookie-cutter, and Tailwind is inline styles and clutter. Lately I've used Bulma (CSS framework) and Buefy (Bulma + Vue) on a couple of projects. I also like the look of Pure CSS, but I haven't used it. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Axure RP and Purecss, you can also consider the following products

UXpin - Design is really about solving problems. UXPin is the UX Design Platform that gets that right.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Figma - Team-based interface design, Figma lets you collaborate on designs in real time.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Moqups - The most stunning HTML5 app for creating resolution-independent SVG mockups, wireframes & interactive prototypes for your next project

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.