Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AWS Device Farm VS Cypress.io

Compare AWS Device Farm VS Cypress.io and see what are their differences

AWS Device Farm logo AWS Device Farm

Improve the quality of your iOS, Android, and web applications by testing against real mobile devices in the AWS Cloud.

Cypress.io logo Cypress.io

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
  • AWS Device Farm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-17
  • Cypress.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17

AWS Device Farm features and specs

  • Wide Range of Devices
    AWS Device Farm provides access to a large selection of real devices, including the latest models. This variety ensures comprehensive testing across different hardware and software configurations.
  • Simultaneous Testing
    Users can run tests concurrently on multiple devices, which speeds up the testing process and provides quicker feedback on app performance.
  • Integration with CI/CD
    Device Farm integrates seamlessly with various Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) tools, facilitating automated testing workflows and streamlined development processes.
  • Detailed Reporting and Logs
    The service provides in-depth test reports and logs, which help in diagnosing issues, debugging, and improving the quality of mobile applications.
  • Custom Test Environment
    Developers can customize the test environment by installing app prerequisites, configuring devices, and uploading test files to simulate real-world usage conditions closely.

Possible disadvantages of AWS Device Farm

  • Cost
    The pricing structure can become expensive, especially for frequent testing or extensive use of multiple devices, thus potentially increasing operational costs.
  • Limited Offline Testing
    Since tests are run on AWS infrastructure, real offline testing scenarios may not be adequately simulated, which can be a limitation for applications requiring offline functionality.
  • Network Dependency
    Testing relies on internet connectivity, which means network issues can impact test reliability and performance, potentially leading to delays or disruptions.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve to understand how to set up and execute tests effectively, as well as navigate the AWS interface and integrations.
  • Geographic Restrictions
    Device Farm infrastructure is located in specific AWS regions, and latency or legal restrictions might affect availability or performance depending on the user's location.

Cypress.io features and specs

  • Easy Setup and Configuration
    Cypress.io is known for its straightforward setup process, requiring minimal configuration to get started with writing and running tests, making it very accessible for developers new to end-to-end testing.
  • Real-time Reloads
    Cypress offers real-time reloading of tests, which improves the development experience by allowing instant feedback on test results as code changes are made.
  • Time Travel Debugging
    Cypress provides the ability to 'time travel' through tests by taking snapshots of the application state at different steps, making it easier to debug and understand failures.
  • Automatic Waiting
    Tests in Cypress automatically wait for commands and assertions, eliminating the need for manual waits and helping to avoid flaky tests due to timing issues.
  • Built-in Mocking and Stubbing
    Cypress has built-in capabilities for mocking and stubbing network requests, which simplifies testing of applications that depend on various services and APIs.
  • Rich Documentation and Community Support
    Cypress boasts comprehensive documentation and an active community, providing plenty of resources for learning and troubleshooting.
  • Cross Browser Testing
    Cypress supports testing in multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, ensuring compatibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cypress.io

  • Limited Browser Support
    Although Cypress supports several major browsers, it does not support legacy browsers like Internet Explorer, which can be a disadvantage for projects that require testing across a wider range of browsers.
  • No Native Mobile App Testing
    Cypress does not natively support mobile app testing, limiting its use for projects that need end-to-end testing on mobile platforms.
  • Heavy Memory Usage
    Cypress can consume significant system resources, particularly memory, which may impact performance during large or complex test runs.
  • Limited Parallelism
    By default, Cypress's parallel execution capabilities are limited, which can slow down the test suite execution for larger projects, although this can be mitigated with the Dashboard Service (a paid feature).
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic tests are easy to set up, leveraging advanced features like custom commands, plugins, and complex test setups can require a steeper learning curve.
  • Incompatibility with Some Testing Ecosystems
    Cypress's architecture and testing approach can sometimes cause compatibility issues with certain testing frameworks and libraries, particularly those that are tightly coupled with traditional WebDriver-based tools.

AWS Device Farm videos

AWS Device Farm iOS Testing for Enterprise customers

More videos:

  • Review - Introducing AWS Device Farm: Automated Android and Fire OS App Testing on Real Devices in AWS Cloud
  • Review - [Arabic Video] Getting Started with AWS Device Farm and Appium
  • Review - What is AWS Device Farm ? | Programming With Ashish
  • Review - Getting Started with AWS Device Farm

Cypress.io videos

Introduction to automation testing with Cypress.io (Non-selenium framework)

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Angular with Cypress.io | Joe Eames | AngularConnect 2018

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS Device Farm and Cypress.io)
Website Testing
25 25%
75% 75
Automated Testing
8 8%
92% 92
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
14 14%
86% 86

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS Device Farm and Cypress.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AWS Device Farm and Cypress.io

AWS Device Farm Reviews

We have no reviews of AWS Device Farm yet.
Be the first one to post

Cypress.io Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Cypress is a holistic automation testing framework where the tester can perform unit, integration, end-to-end, and regression testing. Additionally, they may orchestrate and unify outcomes with quality measurements and useful insights that support the agile workplace by leveraging the Cypress cloud.
Top 10 Perfecto alternatives with Zebrunner on top
- is a SaaS web app for easy scaling test runs and debugging failed tests. Pairs with the open source Cypress Test Runner.
Source: zebrunner.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cypress.io should be more popular than AWS Device Farm. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS Device Farm mentions (17)

  • Connect Appium inspector to a real android device
    Cool thing about Appium is that you can connect it to cloud driver stacks like Amazon Device Farm. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Need free Online Mac OS through browser
    Browserstack - 30 minute trail available AWS Device farm - 1000 minutes trail with aws free tier You can also go DIY with setting up playwright and configuring it to emulate safari browsers. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • CI/CD system using a real device
    You can still use it for building, just not testing. You can probably automate tests using The AWS Device Farm or similar system, but it may be easier to just install each build on your own device and run the tests manually. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Using Selenium WebDriver 4.0 BiDirectional API
    Something I found last minute: Unfortunately this is not supported by AWS Device Farm and it's not clear when it will ever be. This means that this is only supported locally, or for any remote/grid servers that have built-in support for it. I happen to run into the error DevTools is not supported by the Remote Server. If anyone has any solutions or workarounds for this, I'm all ears! - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • I'm starting a new position as a DevOps release engineer and i'm looking for some tips
    Don’t muck with automating simulators, it’s a PITA: we used Https://aws.amazon.com/device-farm/ and it was ok. This was pretty ok: Https://bitrise.io As much as I hate Microsoft, https://appcenter.ms was workable, but required the most calories and was slow. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Cypress.io mentions (27)

  • Ensuring Web Accessibility with Cypress: A Comprehensive Guide
    Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Scenario Outline: Verify all WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify all Accessibility Violations Scenario Outline: Verify P1,P2 WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify only P1, P2 issues Examples: | url | | https://google.com | | https://amazon.in | | https://agoda.com | |... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Simulating Internet Outage and Recovery using Cypress
    In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Scraping a site?
    Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to write tests in Django for JavaScript fetch
    You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's your CI/CD flow made of?
    How are they run (services (ie. GitHub Action Runners, SauceLabs, Cypress.io, etc.), or self hosted autoscaling infrastructures)? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS Device Farm and Cypress.io, you can also consider the following products

TestFlight - iOS beta testing on the fly.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...