Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

AWS CodeCommit VS SourceForge

Compare AWS CodeCommit VS SourceForge and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

AWS CodeCommit logo AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure private Git repositories.

SourceForge logo SourceForge

The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.
  • AWS CodeCommit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22
  • SourceForge Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

AWS CodeCommit videos

+ Add

AWS Codecommit Hands On

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodeCommit
  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodeCommit: Setting Up Permissions

SourceForge videos

+ Add

Presearch Privacy Review #27 - Sourceforge

More videos:

  • Review - Don't Download From SourceForge Any Longer | Tech Link Daily
  • Review - Sourceforge - A great site to find FOSS software

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS CodeCommit and SourceForge)

AWS CodeCommit

SourceForge

Git
33 33%
Git
67% 67
Code Collaboration
27 27%
Code Collaboration
73% 73
Project Management
31 31%
Project Management
69% 69
Git Tools
100 100%
Git Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS CodeCommit and SourceForge. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AWS CodeCommit and SourceForge

AWS CodeCommit Reviews

We have no reviews of AWS CodeCommit yet.
Be the first one to post

SourceForge Reviews

7 Best GitHub Alternatives
Sourceforge has been around longer than most, and it has the projects to prove it. Lots of open source Linux, Windows and Mac projects are hosted on SF. It has a totally different project structure when compared with GitHub. You can only create projects with a unique name. SF unlike others, also lets you host both static and dynamic pages, with the option of integrating a...
Source: beebom.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodeCommit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS CodeCommit mentions (22)

View more

SourceForge mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SourceForge yet. Tracking of SourceForge recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS CodeCommit and SourceForge, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Loading...