Automatic App Landing Page VS Kitemaker

You might find this project interesting --> https://github.com/emilbaehr/automatic-app-landing-page. Source: about 1 year ago

If you just need a landing page for your app there are turnkey solutions for that. I used this free one that is almost turnkey https://github.com/emilbaehr/automatic-app-landing-page. Source: over 2 years ago

I use a variant of this https://github.com/emilbaehr/automatic-app-landing-page for my landing page for https://mixtapesapp.com, and for https://evohiitapp.com. It works really well for my use case, although I really need to get around to updating it! You can run it on GitHub pages, GitLab or Netlify for free from memory only paying for the domain name. I’m on mobile so don’t have all the details at hand but if... Source: over 2 years ago

I'll fix that up shortly, but yes! Its a really neat Github Pages template - you can find it here: Https://github.com/emilbaehr/automatic-app-landing-page. Source: about 3 years ago

When we built Kitemaker [0] we elected to not use CRDTs. We built our sync engine after reading the blog article Figma wrote about they didn't need CRDTs because they have the server arbitrating any conflicts. We ended up taking the same approach. It's worked out very well for us though in a tool like our "last one in wins" generally works fine and doesn't lead to a lot of surprises. For documents, we had to do... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

There is no one-size-fits-all approach to writing descriptions, so you need to figure out what works best for you and your team. However, seeing real-world examples might inspire you to find new ways to write them. Here are some examples from descriptions we have written for Kitemaker. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Kitemaker.co - Collaborate through all phases of the product development process and keep track of work across Slack, Discord, Figma, and Github. Unlimited users, unlimited spaces. Free plan up to 250 work items. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

At Kitemaker, we recently made the leap to Recoil.js for our React state management needs. Before using Recoil, Kitemaker used a simple state management solution built upon useReducer(). We built Kitemaker to be super fast, responding to every user interaction instantly. However, in organizations with lots of data, we sometimes had a difficult time achieving this due to unnecessary re-renders. Kitemaker has a sync... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Definitely feel your pain. We did a full OT implementation for our startup [0] and it was a beast. We based it on Slate.js which has a nice concept of operations that maps nicely to OT, but it was still a lot of work to get it working well (and there are still rough edges we try to improve all of the time). We did base it on Postgres in the backend so really looking forward to what the Supabase team comes up with... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago