Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

autoComplete.js VS OpenKM

Compare autoComplete.js VS OpenKM and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

OpenKM logo OpenKM

OpenKM is an easy to use powerful version control system that enables businesses efficiently and systematically capture, store, secure, manage, maintain and distribute corporate information assets with the goal of facilitating knowledge creation, op…
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • OpenKM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

OpenKM features and specs

  • Comprehensive Document Management
    OpenKM offers a wide range of features including document storage, retrieval, version control, and workflow automation, making it a comprehensive solution for document management.
  • Open-Source
    As an open-source software, OpenKM allows for extensive customization and flexibility, letting organizations tailor the system to meet their specific needs.
  • Scalability
    OpenKM is scalable, which means it can grow with your organization, accommodating increasing amounts of documents and users without performance degradation.
  • Integration
    The system supports a variety of integrations with other business applications like CRM, ERP, and email systems, enhancing its utility within an enterprise environment.
  • Security
    OpenKM provides strong security features, including access controls, encryption, and audit trails, ensuring sensitive information remains protected.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The software features an intuitive user interface, simplifying navigation and making it easier for users to manage their documents efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of OpenKM

  • Complex Installation
    The installation and configuration process can be complex and time-consuming, often requiring technical expertise to set up properly.
  • Maintenance
    Regular maintenance and updates are necessary to keep the system running smoothly, which can incur additional time and resource costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite the user-friendly interface, the extensive features and options available in OpenKM can result in a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Limited Support
    While OpenKM offers community support, the level and immediacy of support may be limited compared to commercial solutions unless a support plan is purchased.
  • Customization Costs
    Although the software is open-source, extensive customization might require professional development services, which can increase overall implementation costs.

autoComplete.js videos

No autoComplete.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

OpenKM videos

OpenKM Desktop Overview #1

More videos:

  • Review - Intro to Document Management Systems w/ Focus on OpenKM
  • Review - OpenKM - webinar in english

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and OpenKM)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Document Management System

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and OpenKM. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and OpenKM, you can also consider the following products

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

AODocs - AODocs is the document management solution recommended for G Suite. Secure your documents, structure your content, & automate your processes

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

infoRouter - infoRouter is a EDMS that includes Workflow, Document routing, Electronic Forms, Scanning, Storage, Archiving, Indexing & Records Management

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

Docomotion - Docomotion offers tools for designing and generating all types of transactional and operational business documents.