Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

autoComplete.js VS Coverity Scan

Compare autoComplete.js VS Coverity Scan and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

autoComplete.js logo autoComplete.js

Simple autocomplete pure vanilla Javascript library.

Coverity Scan logo Coverity Scan

Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
  • autoComplete.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-07-12
  • Coverity Scan Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13

autoComplete.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    autoComplete.js is a lightweight library, with a very small file size, making it fast to load and easy to integrate without significantly impacting page performance.
  • Easy to Implement
    The library is straightforward and easy to integrate into any project, providing a quick setup process with minimal configuration needed to get started.
  • Customizable
    Offers various customization options, allowing developers to modify appearance and behavior to fit the specific needs of their application.
  • No Dependencies
    autoComplete.js does not rely on external libraries like jQuery, making it a stand-alone solution that reduces dependency management concerns.
  • Accessibility Features
    The library includes accessibility support, such as keyboard navigation, which enhances usability for users with disabilities.

Possible disadvantages of autoComplete.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, autoComplete.js has a more limited feature set, which may not suffice for very complex implementations.
  • Community Support
    autoComplete.js has a smaller community, meaning there might be fewer third-party resources, plugins, or updated guides available compared to more popular libraries.
  • Scalability
    For projects with large-scale requirements or complex data structures, the lightweight nature of the library might pose limitations in terms of scalability.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customization is a benefit, it may require deeper knowledge of CSS and JavaScript to fully leverage the customization potential, which can be a hurdle for some developers.

Coverity Scan features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    Coverity Scan offers deep and comprehensive analysis of your codebase, enabling the detection of critical bugs and security vulnerabilities that might be missed by other tools.
  • Wide Language Support
    Coverity Scan supports a wide range of programming languages including C, C++, Java, JavaScript, and Python, making it versatile for various projects.
  • Integration with Development Workflow
    Seamlessly integrates with popular version control systems like GitHub, making it easy to incorporate into your existing development workflow.
  • Actionable Reports
    Provides detailed and actionable reports that help developers understand the root cause of issues and how to fix them efficiently.
  • Free for Open Source
    Available for free for open-source projects, making it an accessible tool for community-driven and non-commercial projects.

Possible disadvantages of Coverity Scan

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, especially for teams that are new to static code analysis tools.
  • Performance Overhead
    The analysis process can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down other operations on the server or local machine.
  • Limited Free Usage
    While free for open-source projects, commercial projects require a paid license, which might be a drawback for startups or small enterprises with limited budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The tool has a steep learning curve, requiring developers to spend considerable time understanding how to best use its features and interpret the results.
  • False Positives
    Like many static analysis tools, Coverity Scan can generate false positives, potentially leading to time spent investigating non-issues.

Analysis of Coverity Scan

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Coverity Scan is widely regarded as a good tool for static code analysis.

Why this product is good

  • Integration
    Provides integrations with various CI/CD tools and can be easily incorporated into existing workflows.
  • Code quality
    It helps in improving code quality by detecting defects in the codebase.
  • Community trust
    Trusted by a large community of open-source projects with a proven track record.
  • Wide language support
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for different projects.

Recommended for

  • Open-source projects looking to improve code quality for free.
  • Development teams needing thorough static analysis to enhance code security and quality.
  • Projects requiring support for multiple programming languages.
  • Teams aiming to integrate static analysis into their continuous integration processes.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to autoComplete.js and Coverity Scan)

autoComplete.js

Coverity Scan

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
Code Analysis
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Code Review
0 0%
Code Review
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using autoComplete.js and Coverity Scan. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare autoComplete.js and Coverity Scan

autoComplete.js Reviews

We have no reviews of autoComplete.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Coverity Scan Reviews

8 Best Static Code Analysis Tools For 2024
Coverity by Synopsys is one of the code scanning tools widely used for static code analysis. It can help you easily identify and fix various issues, improving performance and reducing build times.
Source: www.qodo.ai
Ten Best SonarQube alternatives in 2021
Coverity has several lovely pieces of documentation that offer you all the data you would possibly want while writing code. What's greater, if you have any questions about the code you are presently using, you can continually look at it online. The entire enterprise can use Coverity, and most of the records developers in many organizations are currently using it inside nearby.
Source: duecode.io
TOP 40 Static Code Analysis Tools (Best Source Code Analysis Tools)
Coverity Scan is an open-source cloud-based tool. It works for projects written using C, C++, Java C# or JavaScript. This tool provides a very detailed and clear description of the issues which help in faster resolution. A good choice if you are looking for an open-source tool.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Coverity Scan seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

autoComplete.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of autoComplete.js yet. Tracking of autoComplete.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Coverity Scan mentions (4)

  • I created this point of sale system for restaurants and hospitality. The All-In-One has a 15.6" touchscreen running a Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4L and is made by Chipsee in Bejing, China. I'm helping a friend install it in a restaurant on the St. Lawrence River where he is the Executive Chef.
    You can use Coverity for free on open source code. I use it on an app I open sourced for packet processing. https://scan.coverity.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Scan.coverity.com — Static code analysis for Java, C/C++, C# and JavaScript, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • CDN dollar just hit 6 year high.
    I personally remember Coverity Scan being completely offline for like 6 months while they tried to deal with infrastructure abuse from people mining bitcoin on their computing clusters. Source: about 4 years ago
  • GCC 10.3 has been released
    > Does anyone know any good static analysers other than gcc's or clang's? Visual C++ as well, because since the XP SP2 issues, Microsoft has come up with SAL, which you can also use on your own code, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/code-quality/using-sal-annotations-to-reduce-c-cpp-code-defects?view=msvc-160 Then specialized tooling just for this purpose, just two examples, https://scan.coverity.com/... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing autoComplete.js and Coverity Scan, you can also consider the following products

Angular InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful search UX on top of Angular

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

InstantSearch iOS by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX in Swift & Objective-C

Checkmarx - The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.

Vue InstantSearch by Algolia - Build beautiful Search UX on top of Vue.js & Laravel

Veracode - Veracode's application security software products are simpler and more scalable to increase the resiliency of your application infrastructure.

Loading...