Based on our record, Apache Flink should be more popular than Astronomer. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
A quick tip for airflow if you don't have a local install (and I heartily recommend a local install - astronomer.io has an easy to set up container). Source: over 1 year ago
Julian LaNeve is an engineer and data scientist who currently works at Astronomer.io as a Product Manager. In his free time, he enjoys playing poker, chess and winning data science competitions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Then load up docker, don't need to be a docker expert, just install docker desktop on windows or use linux. Go to astronomer.io and look at how to run airflow (cron++) in docker. Get that working. If you don't know python but do program in some language, you should be able to get up to speed on the basics pretty quickly. If you know python, it will be a breeze. Source: over 2 years ago
Hello guys, I am currently looking for the right orchestration to build a data pipeline composed of long running tasks (python scripts) among which some run in parallel. Although I was firstly hesitating between Apache Airflow and AWS Step functions, it appeared setting Airflow for production might be too complicated without using a way too expensive service meant for that intent( aws managed worflows or... Source: almost 3 years ago
Data scientists often prefer Python for its simplicity and powerful libraries like Pandas or SciPy. However, many real-time data processing tools are Java-based. Take the example of Kafka, Flink, or Spark streaming. While these tools have their Python API/wrapper libraries, they introduce increased latency, and data scientists need to manage dependencies for both Python and JVM environments. For example,... - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
Other stream processing engines (such as Flink and Spark Streaming) provide SQL interfaces too, but the key difference is a streaming database has its storage. Stream processing engines require a dedicated database to store input and output data. On the other hand, streaming databases utilize cloud-native storage to maintain materialized views and states, allowing data replication and independent storage scaling. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Also, this knowledge applies to learning more about data engineering, as this field of software engineering relies heavily on the event-driven approach via tools like Spark, Flink, Kafka, etc. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Apache SeaTunnel is a data integration platform that offers the three pillars of data pipelines: sources, transforms, and sinks. It offers an abstract API over three possible engines: the Zeta engine from SeaTunnel or a wrapper around Apache Spark or Apache Flink. Be careful, as each engine comes with its own set of features. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Due to the technology transformation we want to do recently, we started to investigate Apache Iceberg. In addition, the data processing engine we use in house is Apache Flink, so it's only fair to look for an experimental environment that integrates Flink and Iceberg. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Segment - We make customer data simple.
Apache Spark - Apache Spark is an engine for big data processing, with built-in modules for streaming, SQL, machine learning and graph processing.
PieSync - Seamless two-way sync between your CRM, marketing apps and Google in no time
Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.
Birdly - Birdly is an expense management and expense report solution for SMBs.
Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.