Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ASP.NET Zero VS ASP.NET Core

Compare ASP.NET Zero VS ASP.NET Core and see what are their differences

ASP.NET Zero logo ASP.NET Zero

ASP.NET Zero makes your everyday development effort stress-free by means of a comprehensive web application structure. ASP.NET Zero Developers.

ASP.NET Core logo ASP.NET Core

With ASP.
  • ASP.NET Zero Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02
  • ASP.NET Core Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-18

ASP.NET Zero features and specs

  • Feature-Rich Boilerplate
    ASP.NET Zero provides a rich set of pre-built features such as authentication, user management, role management, and more, which significantly accelerate development.
  • Customizability
    The framework is highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the application to specific business needs without starting from scratch.
  • Consistent Updates
    ASP.NET Zero is regularly updated to align with the latest web development technologies and practices, ensuring that your applications are built on current standards.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    It offers detailed documentation and tutorials, which helps developers understand and implement the framework quickly and effectively.
  • Responsive Support
    The platform provides a responsive and helpful support team that assists with issues and inquiries, making it easier to solve development challenges.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET Zero

  • Cost
    ASP.NET Zero is not open-source and requires a licensing fee, which might be a barrier for small teams or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with ASP.NET or the specific architectural patterns used, there can be a significant learning curve to effectively utilize the framework.
  • Overhead
    The abundance of features and configurations can introduce unnecessary complexity for simple projects, potentially leading to higher overhead.
  • Dependency on Specific Frameworks
    ASP.NET Zero is heavily tied to specific Microsoft technologies and frameworks, which might limit flexibility if you choose to switch tech stacks.
  • Updates and Compatibility Issues
    Frequent updates require effort from your team to keep the project in sync, potentially leading to compatibility issues with custom code over time.

ASP.NET Core features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Support
    ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform framework, which means you can run your applications on Windows, macOS, and Linux. This flexibility allows developers to target a wider range of environments without being locked into a single operating system.
  • High Performance
    ASP.NET Core is known for its high performance, being built from the ground up to optimize speed and scalability. It uses a modular framework architecture and supports asynchronous programming, making it suitable for modern, high-traffic applications.
  • Unified MVC and Web API Frameworks
    In ASP.NET Core, MVC and Web API frameworks are unified into a single framework, simplifying the development model for building web and API-based applications.
  • Dependency Injection
    Built-in support for dependency injection simplifies the management of dependencies across the application, promoting cleaner architecture and testability.
  • Open Source and Community Support
    ASP.NET Core is open source and has a strong community around it. This means that developers have access to the source code and can contribute to its development. It also benefits from continuous improvements driven by community feedback.
  • Cloud Integration
    ASP.NET Core is designed with cloud deployment in mind, providing features and templates for streamlined integration with cloud platforms such as Azure.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET Core

  • Learning Curve
    While powerful, ASP.NET Core can have a steep learning curve for developers new to the framework or web development in general, due to its comprehensive set of features and tools.
  • Maturity of Third-Party Libraries
    Compared to the .NET Framework, some third-party libraries may not be fully mature or offer as many features, given that ASP.NET Core is a more recent platform.
  • Frequent Updates
    ASP.NET Core has a fast release cycle, which can be challenging for developers to keep up with. Frequent updates can mean regular changes to the framework that might require adjustments in application code.
  • Limited Windows-Specific Technology Support
    Some Windows-specific technologies and libraries might have limited or no support in ASP.NET Core, which can be a disadvantage for applications heavily reliant on those technologies.

ASP.NET Zero videos

ASP.NET Zero Introduction and Features

More videos:

  • Review - Build a Real-world Apps in Asp.Net Zero using Asp.Net Core & Angular

ASP.NET Core videos

Intro to ASP.NET Core Razor Pages - From Start to Published

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ASP.NET Zero and ASP.NET Core)
Developer Tools
21 21%
79% 79
Web Frameworks
19 19%
81% 81
Python Web Framework
15 15%
85% 85
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using ASP.NET Zero and ASP.NET Core. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ASP.NET Zero and ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Zero Reviews

We have no reviews of ASP.NET Zero yet.
Be the first one to post

ASP.NET Core Reviews

Top 5 Flutter Alternatives for Cross-Platform Development
As for performance, both ASP.NET and Flutter perform really well. For ASP.NET Core, it’s partly due to the lightweight and efficient Kestrel web server. Flutter’s speed is thanks to the Dart VM and Ahead-of-Time (AOT) compilation.
Source: www.miquido.com
Exploring 15 Powerful Flutter Alternatives
ASP.NET Core is an open-source and cross-platform framework for building modern cloud-enabled web apps on Windows, Mac, and Linux. One unique capability ASP.NET Core introduces relates to scalability. The framework provides native integration with cloud platforms like Azure that allow web apps to scale up or out to potentially even millions of users with no code...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ASP.NET Core seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ASP.NET Zero mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ASP.NET Zero yet. Tracking of ASP.NET Zero recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ASP.NET Core mentions (5)

  • The Case For Go Backends
    However, usage of a C# framework like ASP .NET Core or a Java framework like OfficeFloor are more than capable in the right hands. The key is to understand the tradeoffs of each language and framework, and to choose the right tool for the job. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Exploring Xperience By Kentico: Introductions
    The administration UI is now built on React and ASP.NET Core which means it's fast 🚀! - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Trying to learn ASP.NET core, but confused by the documentation
    Per https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/learn/aspnet/what-is-aspnet-core, "ASP.NET Core is the open-source version of ASP.NET, that runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows. ASP.NET Core was first released in 2016 and is a re-design of earlier Windows-only versions of ASP.NET.". Source: over 2 years ago
  • How can I convince my boss not to use Windows Server?
    But how about you both get your wishes: ASP.NET Core? Use a Linux server - with which you are familiar with, to host the live/production version. And the web application itself can be locally developed and tested in ASP.NET on a Windows server, which is what your boss wants? Source: over 3 years ago
  • 3 Different Hosting Models in Blazor
    Let’s remember that ASP.NET Core is cross-platform and can run practically anywhere. If you find yourself using C # for all your development, this is probably the best scenario for you to use anyway. With it, you can deploy your web application, which would also contain your Blazor Wasm assets in the same location. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ASP.NET Zero and ASP.NET Core, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Play Framework - An open source web framework which follows the model-view-controller architecture. It is light-weight, web-friendly, and stateless. It provides minimal overhead for highly-scalable applications.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Adonis JS - AdonisJs is a Node.js web framework with breath of fresh air and drizzle of elegant syntax on top of it

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

CodeBehind Framework - CodeBehind is a new framework based on .NET Core version 7.0. The CodeBehind framework inherits all the features of .NET Core and gives it more simplicity and flexibility. CodeBehind framework is owned by Elanat.