ASP.NET VS Roda Framework

Compare ASP.NET VS Roda Framework and see what are their differences

Flagsmith

Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured

The page you are looking for does not exist

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

ASP.NET

ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Roda Framework

Roda is a lightweight and productive framework for building web applications in Ruby.

Landing page //
2023-04-29

Landing page //
2021-11-26

ASP.NET

Website: dotnet.microsoft.com

Edit details

Roda Framework

Website: roda.jeremyevans.net

Edit details

ASP.NET features and specs

Performance
ASP.NET is known for its high performance and scalability. It compiles server-side code to DLL files, which is executed on the server side, thereby speeding up the application's response time.
Security
ASP.NET provides built-in security features like form authentication and Windows authentication, as well as protection against common threats such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and request forgery.
Rich Toolbox
Visual Studio, the Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for ASP.NET, offers a rich toolbox with a plethora of controls, automatic deployment features, and other tools that significantly speed up development.
Cross-Platform Support
ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform framework, which means you can run your web applications on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
Community and Support
ASP.NET has a strong community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to problems and ensuring continuous improvement and support.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET

Learning Curve
The framework can be complex for beginners, especially those without experience in C# or the .NET ecosystem.
Cost
While ASP.NET Core is free and open-source, some advanced features and tools require a Visual Studio subscription, which can be expensive.
Hosting
Although ASP.NET Core has improved in terms of cross-platform hosting, traditional ASP.NET applications are primarily optimized for Windows servers, limiting hosting options.
Resource Intensive
ASP.NET applications can be more resource-intensive than applications built with some other frameworks, which can lead to higher infrastructure costs.
Complexity
The framework offers a lot of features and functionalities, which can sometimes make it overly complex and harder to manage for smaller projects.

Roda Framework features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

ASP.NET videos

+ Add

Build Rating and Review System in ASP.NET MVC and Entity Framework

Roda Framework videos

No Roda Framework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ASP.NET and Roda Framework)

ASP.NET

Roda Framework

Developer Tools

96 96%

Developer Tools

4% 4

Web Frameworks

96 96%

Web Frameworks

4% 4

Python Web Framework

100 100%

Python Web Framework

0% 0

Ruby Web Framework

81 81%

Ruby Web Framework

19% 19

User comments

Share your experience with using ASP.NET and Roda Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ASP.NET and Roda Framework

ASP.NET Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development

ASP.NET’s got that Microsoft muscle, a powerhouse of a framework for building dynamic web services and more. It lets you roll out robust websites with the smoothness that comes with deep pockets. Perfect for .NET software development teams.

Source: tms-outsource.com

Top 10 Phoenix Framework Alternatives

Moving over to the .NET platform, Asp.Net is an open-source web framework developed by Microsoft that allows developers to build dynamic web pages, apps, and services using HTML, JavaScript, and CSS.

Source: blog.back4app.com

10 Ruby on Rails Alternatives For Web Development in 2022

Last but not least, a back-end web framework created by Microsoft for the development of dynamic web pages - ASP.NET. Built on top of C# it is one the fastest frameworks available on the market. ASP.NET is capable of handling 7.01 million requests per second while Django handles only 79,266 requests. The framework is mainly used for building web applications, APIs,...

Source: www.ideamotive.co

Roda Framework Reviews

We have no reviews of Roda Framework yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ASP.NET should be more popular than Roda Framework. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ASP.NET mentions (22)

30,656 Pages of Books About the .NET Ecosystem: C#, Blazor, ASP.NET, & T-SQL
Most of the books teach C# and .NET, ASP.NET, Blazor, or T-SQL. I also found some .NET-specific coverage of wider topics: architecture and design, concurrency, automated tests, functional programming, and dependency injection. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Diversify Your Tech Stack: Uncovering Powerful Node js Alternatives
Built by Microsoft, .NET is a high-performance application platform that uses C# for programming. .NET is cross-platform and comes with plenty of libraries and APIs covering collections, networking, and machine learning to build different types of applications. ASP.NET Core widens the .NET developer platform with libraries and tools geared towards web applications. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
C# Fundamentals
Web Applications: ASP.NET, a powerful framework for building web applications, is primarily based on C#. Developers can create dynamic websites, web APIs, and services with ASP.NET. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release
The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?
Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: about 2 years ago

Roda Framework mentions (3)

It's not Ruby that's slow, it's your database
Personal opinion, if I was going to use htmx with a PORO backend I'd probably go for Roda[1] and Sequel. If it was going to be read heavy I think I'd also pair that with SQLite for low latency and cheaper deployments. If I didn't know exactly how requirements are likely to change over time I'd probably go with with Rails, Postgres[2], Redis and Hotwire. You can go a long way with that and a small team. 1. ... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
To Ruby from Python
This is personal opinion but these days I'd probably swap Sinatra for Roda[1] for small API services. It's generally faster, uses less memory and is a really good example of well written ruby code, IMHO. I also really like Jeremy Evans' book, Polished Ruby. 1. http://roda.jeremyevans.net/index.html. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Don't make me think, or why I switched to Rails from JavaScript SPAs
It’s not really true that there are no other options for web development in ruby. Roda[1], for instance, has a strong following for API work. It’s just that Rails is a safe choice. 1. http://roda.jeremyevans.net/index.html. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago