PouchDB might be a bit more popular than ASP.NET. We know about 21 links to it since March 2021 and only 20 links to ASP.NET. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Web Applications: ASP.NET, a powerful framework for building web applications, is primarily based on C#. Developers can create dynamic websites, web APIs, and services with ASP.NET. - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: over 1 year ago
Cloud functions run aspnet core under the hood, but since it is a controlled environment it was designed in a way that the only concern you should worry about is running your function so all of the usual boilerplate related to adding services, middleware or enabling features is hidden away from you which for most simple scenarios this is what you will need and in the case of F# where dependency injection is more... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I'm doing "backend data processing microservices" and the main framework component is ASP. Source: over 1 year ago
How does this compare to PouchDB[1]? [1]: https://pouchdb.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Meteor wrapped the MongoDB API for this purpose. You are working with collections and can run the same queries over them, regardless of whether you are connected to a DB instance or the browser's local storage. For CouchDB an equivalent exists in the form of PouchDB: https://pouchdb.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Not sure if you're thinking more of an official standard but PouchDB is open source and sounds similar to what you're talking about: https://pouchdb.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
I have another use case that DO would be perfect for, and that's sync for offline first apps. I have two offline first apps, both using PouchDB[1] as client database and CouchDB as server database. I'd love to replace CouchDB with DO. Maybe you can hire some of the people contributing to PouchDB to build a backend for it using DO? [1]: https://pouchdb.com. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
PouchDB might be of interest - https://pouchdb.com/ - "PouchDB was created to help web developers build applications that work as well offline as they do online. Source: over 1 year ago
Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...
CouchDB - HTTP + JSON document database with Map Reduce views and peer-based replication
Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
RxDB - A fast, offline-first, reactive Database for JavaScript Applications
Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
GraphQL - GraphQL is a data query language and runtime to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps.