How does this compare to PouchDB[1]? [1]: https://pouchdb.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Meteor wrapped the MongoDB API for this purpose. You are working with collections and can run the same queries over them, regardless of whether you are connected to a DB instance or the browser's local storage. For CouchDB an equivalent exists in the form of PouchDB: https://pouchdb.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Not sure if you're thinking more of an official standard but PouchDB is open source and sounds similar to what you're talking about: https://pouchdb.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
I have another use case that DO would be perfect for, and that's sync for offline first apps. I have two offline first apps, both using PouchDB[1] as client database and CouchDB as server database. I'd love to replace CouchDB with DO. Maybe you can hire some of the people contributing to PouchDB to build a backend for it using DO? [1]: https://pouchdb.com. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
PouchDB might be of interest - https://pouchdb.com/ - "PouchDB was created to help web developers build applications that work as well offline as they do online. Source: about 1 year ago
PouchDB: this is a wrapper around IndexedDB and WebSQL which is compatible with your backend CouchDB setup. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
PouchDB is a JavaScript database usable on both the browser and server, heavily inspired by CouchDB. It's a powerful database already thanks to a great API, but its ability to sync with one or more databases makes it a no-brainer for offline capable apps. By enabling PouchDB to sync with CouchDB, we can focus on writing data directly in PouchDB and it will take care of syncing that data with CouchDB, eventually.... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I'm not going to go into whether you should or shouldn't do that, it completely depends on your use case. Now, on how to do it - you can't use SQLite in a web app. Your best bet is indexeddb, which is very well suported https://caniuse.com/indexeddb or WebSQL, which is less-so https://caniuse.com/?search=websql or perhaps something like https://pouchdb.com/. Source: almost 2 years ago
The Viewer. It serves a PDF viewer which is built on top of the Mozilla PDF.js library. Another component is the PouchDB library, which we use to store annotations locally. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
You should try nosql but instead of Mongooose I'd suggest going against the grain a bit and look at PouchDB. Source: almost 2 years ago
I would definitely hone in on React if that is your choice of frameworks. Nodejs is a good choice for server side as well. If you're looking to stay purely js, I saw https://pouchdb.com/. Source: almost 2 years ago
For data storage / syncing I plan to use RTK for app state (auth, ui, note edits) and possibly PouchDB for persistent local state and built-in syncing to a CouchDB server. My other option would be to just persist local data with SQLite, and roll my own logic to sync that to an SQL server. Source: about 2 years ago
Yes, a similar and more popular solution like this is PouchDB, and looking at the example of the library this is a wrapper over PouchDB. Looking at stars for PouchDB on GitHub (14k) it really popular solution. And RxDB just adds the Reactive part. Source: over 2 years ago
It sounds like a database that both exists in the cloud and locally on your device. Which sounds useful! But then, PouchDB already exists: https://pouchdb.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
A bit offtrack - does anybody know how rxdb differs from PouchDB? https://pouchdb.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
So I am building a project using databases called CouchDB & PouchDB. I have talked them first here where PouchDB was giving me trouble, it turned out be me not knowing my javascript good enough. π. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
I am using CouchDB & PouchDB for one of my projects. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Maybe you can try CouchDB alongside with PouchDB integration on client side? This page contains a comparison between them. Source: almost 3 years ago
Personally, I prefer using CouchDB for server side storage and PouchDB.js on the client side because you can start making your app and storing your data with just PouchDB and run it entirely in your web browser. Source: almost 3 years ago
Not SQL, but https://pouchdb.com/ looks like a better version of this. Also not SQL, IndexedDB [0] Seems like a well-supported [1] document database built into the browser would beat LocalStorage in almost every way. That's what I've found in my experience at least. Maybe SQL just isn't the right tool on either the frontend or the backend? [0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/IndexedDB_A... [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
IndexedDB API is low-level and may seem a bit daunting to use to some. For this reason, libraries such as localForage, dexie.js, ZangoDB, PouchDB, idb, idb-keyval, JsStore and lovefield provide a simpler API that makes IndexedDB more programmer-friendly. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing PouchDB to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about PouchDB. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.