While Asana is a robust task management and project planning tool, in my experience, it falls slightly short when compared to Trello, particularly in terms of user-friendliness and simplicity. Asana offers a variety of features such as multiple project views (list, board, timeline, calendar), custom fields, and reporting tools, which can be highly beneficial for complex project management. However, I found that the learning curve can be steep, especially for team members not familiar with this type of software. The interface, while feature-rich, can feel a bit cluttered and overwhelming for new users. On the other hand, Trello shines in its simplicity and straightforward design. The visual card and board system is intuitive and easy to grasp, making it a more accessible tool for team members of varying tech proficiency levels. Additionally, Trello's user interface is cleaner and more streamlined, which contributes to an overall more enjoyable user experience.
In terms of collaboration, both tools provide good collaborative features like commenting, tagging, and task assignment. However, I appreciate Trello's flexibility with its Power-Ups, allowing integration with a wide array of apps which enhances its functionality. In conclusion, while Asana is a powerful tool with extensive features, I prefer Trello for its ease of use, simplicity, and intuitive design. However, I do see the value of Asana for larger teams or more complex projects.
Asana is a popular project management tool that has a lot to offer. It is fast and versatile, making it easy for individuals and teams to collaborate and get things done. The interface is clean and user-friendly, and there are plenty of features to help you organise and track your projects.
However, while Asana is a good tool, it is not the best on the market. One of its main weaknesses is its lack of advanced reporting and analysis capabilities. It can be challenging to get a comprehensive view of your projects and how they are progressing, especially if you have a large number of them.
Another issue is the cost. Asana can be expensive for teams with a lot of members, especially when compared to other project management tools that offer similar features at a lower price point.
Asana is a very representative app for the work environment I'm a part of with team members and users it's stellar for: β’ To manage it on the web and portable devices β’ With option and manageability on the web β’ To set up projects and invite team members. β’ The projects have a roadmap to know the displacement of each activity. β’ Tasks can contain subtasks to keep track of work β’ Allows granting tasks, define expiration periods. β’ Effective and useful for adding files, making comments, and tags.
Based on our record, Asana seems to be a lot more popular than Apple ARKit. While we know about 86 links to Asana, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Apple ARKit. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Asana.com β Free for private project with collaborators. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Asana: Another project management tool that provides task assignment and progress tracking features. [Official Website]. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
You could check out Asana, Monday, ClickUp and GoodDay for example (I use the latter). Source: 7 months ago
For most teams who don't have the option to subscribe to popular Project Management apps like JIRA, Asana, ClickUp, or Monday, you can make use of GitHub's issue management system to track the bugs in your application. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Asana is the gold standard when it comes to a project management tool, allowing teams to organize tasks, track progress, and keep everyone on the same page. With a focus on visual task management, Asana enables you to map out all your projects in customizable boards, lists, or timeline views, with deadlines and dependencies all there to see. Not only that, but teams can extend Asana's functionality even further by... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Apple has quite nice page with docs at the bottom: https://developer.apple.com/augmented-reality/. Source: 11 months ago
Feels like you're grasping at straws to dismiss them. If you think lower weight, not-grainy MR, six years of a public AR SDK, far better computing units, and an existing high-quality software ecosystem are "not noticeable", I'm left wondering what you think is noticeable. Source: about 1 year ago
If you're looking to build a more advanced application, there are plenty of useful resources for all major technologies. For mobile apps, the best places to get started are docs for Google ARCore and Apple ARKit. Both platforms work with popular gaming engines like Unity and Unreal Engine. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
ARKit is Apple's (A)ugmented (R)eality development (K)it. It takes the output from Unity and displays it in the goggles/headset the guy is wearing to see all this. Well, what a camera pointed at the display sees. Source: over 2 years ago
Google and Apple have already released their augmented reality development platforms, ARCore or ARKit, enabling the seamless integration of the digital and physical worlds. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.
Made With ARKit - Hand-picked curation of the coolest stuff made with ARKit
Wrike - Wrike is a flexible, scalable, and easy-to-use collaborative work management software that helps high-performance teams organize and accomplish their work. Try it now.
Google ARCore - Google Augmented Reality SDK
Basecamp - A simple and elegant project management system.
Snap Art - Snap's augmented reality platform