Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AppWrite VS SignalR

Compare AppWrite VS SignalR and see what are their differences

AppWrite logo AppWrite

Appwrite provides web and mobile developers with a set of easy-to-use and integrate REST APIs to manage their core backend needs.

SignalR logo SignalR

SignalR is a server-side software system designed for writing scalable Internet applications, notably web servers.
  • AppWrite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28
  • SignalR Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20

AppWrite features and specs

  • Open Source
    AppWrite is an open-source platform, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, ensuring transparency and flexibility.
  • Self-Hosted
    Being self-hosted, AppWrite gives developers complete control over their data and server environment, enhancing security and customization options.
  • Comprehensive Backend
    AppWrite offers a wide range of backend services out-of-the-box, including authentication, database management, storage, and serverless functions, reducing the need for additional third-party services.
  • Multi-Language Support
    AppWrite supports various programming languages, which makes it versatile and developer-friendly, allowing the integration with different tech stacks.
  • Community and Documentation
    AppWrite has an active community and well-documented guides, tutorials, and API references, which are essential for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of AppWrite

  • Resource Intensive
    Being a self-hosted solution, AppWrite may require significant server resources for optimal performance, which can be costly.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for those less experienced with server management.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    As compared to some other backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platforms, AppWrite has fewer pre-built third-party integrations, which might limit its extensibility.
  • Newer and Evolving
    AppWrite is relatively new and still evolving, which can mean fewer features compared to more mature platforms and the potential for more bugs.
  • Maintenance Responsibility
    Since it is self-hosted, the responsibility for server maintenance, updates, and security falls solely on the user, which can be a drawback for smaller teams or solo developers.

SignalR features and specs

  • Real-time communication
    SignalR enables real-time web functionality, allowing server-side code to push content to connected clients instantly. This is crucial for applications like live chat, real-time notifications, and live data feeds.
  • Simplified development
    SignalR provides a high-level API that abstracts much of the complexity involved in creating real-time web applications, making the development process easier and more efficient.
  • Automatic Reconnection
    SignalR includes automatic reconnection capabilities, so if a client connection is lost, it can automatically try to re-establish the connection without manual intervention.
  • Cross-platform support
    Being part of the ASP.NET Core suite, SignalR works across different platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing greater flexibility in deployment.
  • Transport fallback
    SignalR supports multiple transport protocols (WebSocket, Server-Sent Events, and Long Polling) and can smoothly fall back to a lesser protocol if the preferred one is not available.
  • Security
    SignalR comes with built-in support for authentication and authorization mechanisms to ensure that only authorized users can connect and communicate through the service.

Possible disadvantages of SignalR

  • Scalability concerns
    While SignalR works well for small to medium applications, scaling to a large number of concurrent connections can require significant investments in infrastructure, such as deploying a SignalR backplane.
  • Performance overhead
    The abstraction provided by SignalR can introduce performance overhead, which may not be suitable for applications demanding high performance and low latency.
  • Limited PaaS support
    Although SignalR can be hosted on various platforms, its integration with some Platform as a Service (PaaS) offerings is less mature compared to other technologies designed for real-time communication.
  • Complex deployment
    Setting up a SignalR application, especially with considerations for scaling and high availability, can be complex and require deep knowledge of the underlying infrastructure.
  • Client compatibility
    While SignalR supports multiple clients including JavaScript, .NET, and Java, it may still face compatibility issues with less commonly used technologies or older client systems.
  • Debugging challenges
    Debugging real-time applications built with SignalR can be more challenging compared to traditional web applications due to their asynchronous nature and multiple transport protocols.

AppWrite videos

No AppWrite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SignalR videos

SignalR Tutorial 1 - What is SignalR?

More videos:

  • Review - SignalR Deep Dive: Building Servers - David Fowler & Damian Edwards
  • Tutorial - SignalR Tutorial 3 - Why Use SignalR?
  • Review - Real-time web applications with ASP.NET Core SignalR

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AppWrite and SignalR)
Developer Tools
78 78%
22% 22
Backend As A Service
100 100%
0% 0
App Development
55 55%
45% 45
Mobile Push Messaging
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AppWrite and SignalR. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AppWrite and SignalR

AppWrite Reviews

  1. Appwrite is awesome, free and open-source!

    I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.

    🏁 Competitors: Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Cost effective|Open-source|Great user experience|Super simple|Self hosted
    👎 Cons:    Self hosted

10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Appwrite’s self-hosted nature gives you complete control over your data and infrastructure, great for those who are security-conscious. It also offers a comprehensive set of features, including user authentication, database management, storage, cloud functions, and more. It’s like having your very own Firebase, but on your terms.
Source: genezio.com
Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Appwrite is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform that provides a comprehensive set of tools and APIs to help developers build modern applications. It focuses on simplicity and developer experience.
Source: signoz.io
Best Serverless Backend Tools of 2023: Pros & Cons, Features & Code Examples
Appwrite is a self-hosted BaaS platform giving you all the tools you need to build all sorts of application.
Source: www.rowy.io
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Appwrite permits the development to benefit from its open-source version without paying anything. However, its official website also declares that it will share the pricing details for Appwrite Cloud soon.
12 Best Open-source Database Backend Server and Google Firebase Alternatives
Appwrite is a self-hosted backend server for building web, mobile and desktop apps. It supports multiple applications natively without hacks or workarounds.It features a dashboard for apps, database, user, functions and storage management, real-time analytics per project, live connections monitor, background tasks and webhooks.Appwrite also is suitable for creating Geo-data...
Source: medevel.com

SignalR Reviews

Essential .NET Core Libraries that Every Programmer should know
You can include it in your code by configuring the SignalR API, which creates remote procedure calls for the server-client architecture. In addition, it manages the communication channel and resources for seamlessly transferring data during high traffic.
Source: positiwise.com
12 Most Preferred latest .NET Libraries of 2022
SignalR offers real-time web integration for .NET core apps through its SignalR .NET core library. Using it, developers can push/add data from the server into their applications. Features: Automatic connection management. Simultaneous message-sending to all clients. Scalable to handle increasing traffic. A group of clients can be notified at once with a message.
Source: www.bigscal.com
SignalR Alternatives
SignalR is basically used to allow connection between client and server or vice-versa. It is a type of bi-directional communication between both the client and server. SignalR is compatible with web sockets and many other connections, which help in the direct push of content over the server. There are many alternatives for signalR that are used, like Firebase, pusher,...
Source: www.educba.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppWrite seems to be a lot more popular than SignalR. While we know about 174 links to AppWrite, we've tracked only 5 mentions of SignalR. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AppWrite mentions (174)

  • Build a React File Sharing App with Granular Access Controls (ReBAC)
    Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • Flutter vs Native: Why Flutter Wins for TV App Development
    Flutter plays well with modern backend solutions like Firebase, Supabase, AWS Amplify, Appwrite, and PocketBase. This gives you a variety of options to choose from whether you are an indie developer, startup, established company, agency, or enterprise. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • 5 Tools Every Developer Must Use in 2024
    Appwrite also allows you to manage your application's backend services through a simple and intuitive dashboard, making it easy to monitor and control your resources. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try
    . Netlify : Deploy your web projects with ease. . Render : Host web applications and static sites effortlessly. . GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. . Firebase Hosting: Scale your web apps effortlessly with Firebase. . Vercel: Deploy websites and applications with automatic deployments. . Cyclic.sh: Host your static sites with zero configuration. . Appwrite:... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Why Appwrite Is Your Ideal BaaS in 2024 I'm
    Appwrite is a comprehensive Backend as a Service (BaaS) platform designed to help developers build and scale applications quickly and efficiently. Whether you're a solo indie hacker or part of a growing startup, Appwrite provides the essential features you need—database management, authentication, storage, and cloud functions—all in one unified platform. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

SignalR mentions (5)

  • Get Started with Serverless Architectures: Top Tools You Need to Know
    Azure Functions integrates with most tools in the Microsoft ecosystem, including Azure Queue (adding messages to a queue) and SignalR (sending real-time updates). This makes Azure Functions the perfect choice for real-time applications like chat apps. Here are the top features:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How can I achieve client-server communication as seamless as Blazor Server for Blazor WebAssembly?
    Blazor Server basically has the server remote control puppet everything on the client through SignalR. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Creating a Lightweight Connection Between C# and Python - Over Internet
    SignalR is a layer over websockets, and is available for python. Source: about 2 years ago
  • I'm new to C#, have a little C++ and Java experience from high school and college. My goal is to make an application for two players to play Go.
    Since Go is a pretty simple game and not very graphic intensive, a simple approach would be to use SignalR on ASP.NET, where the server maintains the game board state and just sends minimal messages (for example, piece X moved to location Y, and whose turn it is now) to each player after their respective move in turn. Source: about 2 years ago
  • .NET Modern Task Scheduler
    SignalR and Pinia for real-time stat updates in the dashboard UI. Source: about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AppWrite and SignalR, you can also consider the following products

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

PocketBase.io - Open Source backend with realtime database, authentication, file storage and admin dashboard, all compiled in 1 portable executable.

Pusher - Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps