AppWrite Reviews

1. dndiel

   over 2 years ago
   Appwrite is awesome, free and open-source!

   I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.

   🏁 Competitors: Firebase

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Cost effective|Open-source|Great user experience|Super simple|Self hosted

   👎 Cons:    Self hosted

RedwoodJS Reviews

AppWrite mentions (168)

• Building An E-Commerce Store With NextJS

  Appwrite - for authenticating users, as well as saving and retrieving product details. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

• How I use Appwrite Databases with Pinia to build my own habit tracker

  If you haven't tried Appwrite, make sure you give it a spin. It's a open source backend that packs authentication, databases, storage, serverless functions, and all kinds of utilities in a neat API. Appwrite can be self-hosted, or you can use Appwrite Cloud starting with a generous free plan. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Exploring Appwrite: A Comprehensive Guide

  What is Appwrite? Appwrite is an open-source backend server that abstracts the complexity of backend development, allowing developers to focus on building their applications. It provides a wide range of services including databases, storage, functions, and authentication, all designed to work seamlessly together. This integration simplifies the development process, reducing the need for extensive configuration... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• 11 Planetscale alternatives with free tiers

  Appwrite is an open source BaaS platform that provides services like serverless functions, serverless databases, user authentication, and messaging. Since its release, it has quickly become a popular choice for building websites and applications. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Biometric authentication with Passkeys

  Appwrite for user management, databases, and serverless functions. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

RedwoodJS mentions (41)

• Why We Don't have a Laravel for JavaScript… Yet

  Have a look at the graph above. Laravel and Rails have been around for 13-15 years! The JavaScript frameworks being used in comparison are just getting started, with some of them, like Wasp and Redwood, at similar stages in their development as Laravel and Rails were during their initial years. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago

• The Current State of React Server Components: A Guide for the Perplexed

  The other piece of important information to acknowledge here is that when we say RSCs need a framework, “framework” effectively just means “Next.js.” There are some smaller frameworks (like Waku) that support RSCs. There are also some larger and more established frameworks (like Redwood) that have plans to support RSCs or (like Gatsby) only support RSCs in beta. We will likely see this change once we get React 19... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• What will happen to the full-stack framework in the future?

  Although there are quite a few opinionated battery-included frameworks that have picked up everything for you like RedwoodJS, Blitz, and Create-T3-App, you still need to choose between them and hope that they will remain mainstream and well-maintained in the future. So how should we choose? - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• NextJS vs RedwoodJS

  Web development frameworks in JavaScript, such as NextJS and RedwoodJS, have gained popularity among developers. Choosing the right framework, library, or tool for a project is crucial for efficient development. Developers often seek the best tools to save time and avoid reinventing the wheel. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• Ask HN: I'm abandoning NextJS. What's an alternative full-stack TS solution?

  The community here is pretty friendly. https://redwoodjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago