Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

AppWrite VS NativeBase

Compare AppWrite VS NativeBase and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

AppWrite logo AppWrite

Appwrite provides web and mobile developers with a set of easy-to-use and integrate REST APIs to manage their core backend needs.

NativeBase logo NativeBase

Experience the awesomeness of React Native without the pain
  • AppWrite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28
  • NativeBase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19

AppWrite features and specs

  • Open Source
    AppWrite is an open-source platform, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, ensuring transparency and flexibility.
  • Self-Hosted
    Being self-hosted, AppWrite gives developers complete control over their data and server environment, enhancing security and customization options.
  • Comprehensive Backend
    AppWrite offers a wide range of backend services out-of-the-box, including authentication, database management, storage, and serverless functions, reducing the need for additional third-party services.
  • Multi-Language Support
    AppWrite supports various programming languages, which makes it versatile and developer-friendly, allowing the integration with different tech stacks.
  • Community and Documentation
    AppWrite has an active community and well-documented guides, tutorials, and API references, which are essential for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of AppWrite

  • Resource Intensive
    Being a self-hosted solution, AppWrite may require significant server resources for optimal performance, which can be costly.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for those less experienced with server management.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    As compared to some other backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platforms, AppWrite has fewer pre-built third-party integrations, which might limit its extensibility.
  • Newer and Evolving
    AppWrite is relatively new and still evolving, which can mean fewer features compared to more mature platforms and the potential for more bugs.
  • Maintenance Responsibility
    Since it is self-hosted, the responsibility for server maintenance, updates, and security falls solely on the user, which can be a drawback for smaller teams or solo developers.

NativeBase features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    NativeBase offers components that work seamlessly across both iOS and Android, ensuring a consistent user experience across different devices.
  • Rich Component Library
    Provides a vast collection of pre-built UI components, such as buttons, forms, navigations, and more, significantly speeding up the development process.
  • Customization
    Highly customizable themes and components that allow you to match the look and feel of your app to specific design requirements.
  • Community Support
    Active community and extensive documentation make it easier to find solutions to common problems and get support from fellow developers.
  • Integration with React Native
    Designed to work specifically with React Native, offering better integration and performance compared to more generalized component libraries.
  • Accessible Design
    Offers components and practices aimed at making apps more accessible, which is crucial for creating inclusive applications.

Possible disadvantages of NativeBase

  • Learning Curve
    Can have a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with React Native or component-based design.
  • Performance Overhead
    May introduce some performance overhead due to the abstraction layers, which might not be suitable for performance-critical applications.
  • Dependency Management
    Frequent updates and changes in the library can lead to dependency issues that require regular maintenance and updates.
  • Limited Advanced Customization
    While basic customization is easy, deeply customizing components to fit unique use cases can be challenging and may require additional effort.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying heavily on any proprietary framework or library can make it difficult to switch technologies in the future, constraining flexibility.
  • Size
    The library can add to the overall size of the application, which might be a concern for apps where minimizing the footprint is crucial.

Analysis of AppWrite

Overall verdict

  • AppWrite is a solid option for developers looking for an open-source backend solution with robust features. Its well-documented APIs and active community support make it a viable choice for both small projects and growing applications.

Why this product is good

  • AppWrite is considered a good choice, particularly for its comprehensive backend-as-a-service (BaaS) features that cater to web and mobile developers. It provides a suite of services such as user authentication, databases, file storage, and serverless functions, allowing developers to streamline their development process. Its open-source nature means developers have access to the full code base and the community-drive contributions, ensuring transparency and continuous improvements. AppWrite also emphasizes developer experience, offering easy integration with client-side SDKs and providing extensive documentation.

Recommended for

    AppWrite is recommended for developers building applications who require a scalable backend solution without the overhead of managing infrastructure. It is particularly suited for developers who prefer open-source platforms and those who want to avoid vendor lock-in. AppWrite's features make it a good fit for startups, hobby projects, and even educational purposes where full control over the backend is desirable.

AppWrite videos

No AppWrite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

NativeBase videos

+ Add

NativeBase Market Purchase Flow

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AppWrite and NativeBase)

AppWrite

NativeBase

Developer Tools
89 89%
Developer Tools
11% 11
Development Tools
0 0%
Development Tools
100% 100
Backend As A Service
100 100%
Backend As A Service
0% 0
Realtime Backend / API
100 100%
Realtime Backend / API
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AppWrite and NativeBase. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AppWrite and NativeBase

AppWrite Reviews

  1. dndiel
    Appwrite is awesome, free and open-source!

    I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.

    🏁 Competitors: Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Cost effective|Open-source|Great user experience|Super simple|Self hosted
    👎 Cons:    Self hosted
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Appwrite’s self-hosted nature gives you complete control over your data and infrastructure, great for those who are security-conscious. It also offers a comprehensive set of features, including user authentication, database management, storage, cloud functions, and more. It’s like having your very own Firebase, but on your terms.
Source: genezio.com
Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Appwrite is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform that provides a comprehensive set of tools and APIs to help developers build modern applications. It focuses on simplicity and developer experience.
Source: signoz.io
Best Serverless Backend Tools of 2023: Pros & Cons, Features & Code Examples
Appwrite is a self-hosted BaaS platform giving you all the tools you need to build all sorts of application.
Source: www.rowy.io
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Appwrite permits the development to benefit from its open-source version without paying anything. However, its official website also declares that it will share the pricing details for Appwrite Cloud soon.
Source: digitalcruch.com
12 Best Open-source Database Backend Server and Google Firebase Alternatives
Appwrite is a self-hosted backend server for building web, mobile and desktop apps. It supports multiple applications natively without hacks or workarounds.It features a dashboard for apps, database, user, functions and storage management, real-time analytics per project, live connections monitor, background tasks and webhooks.Appwrite also is suitable for creating Geo-data...
Source: medevel.com

NativeBase Reviews

We have no reviews of NativeBase yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppWrite should be more popular than NativeBase. It has been mentiond 174 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AppWrite mentions (174)

  • Build a React File Sharing App with Granular Access Controls (ReBAC)
    Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Flutter vs Native: Why Flutter Wins for TV App Development
    Flutter plays well with modern backend solutions like Firebase, Supabase, AWS Amplify, Appwrite, and PocketBase. This gives you a variety of options to choose from whether you are an indie developer, startup, established company, agency, or enterprise. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • 5 Tools Every Developer Must Use in 2024
    Appwrite also allows you to manage your application's backend services through a simple and intuitive dashboard, making it easy to monitor and control your resources. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try
    . Netlify : Deploy your web projects with ease. . Render : Host web applications and static sites effortlessly. . GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. . Firebase Hosting: Scale your web apps effortlessly with Firebase. . Vercel: Deploy websites and applications with automatic deployments. . Cyclic.sh: Host your static sites with zero configuration. . Appwrite:... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Why Appwrite Is Your Ideal BaaS in 2024 I'm
    Appwrite is a comprehensive Backend as a Service (BaaS) platform designed to help developers build and scale applications quickly and efficiently. Whether you're a solo indie hacker or part of a growing startup, Appwrite provides the essential features you need—database management, authentication, storage, and cloud functions—all in one unified platform. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
View more

NativeBase mentions (22)

  • Exploring the Best UI Component Libraries for React Native apps
    Gluestack, like any other customizable UI library, is built to make styling less cumbersome. It comprises a set of themed and unstyled components easily integrated across different platforms and devices. Originally, Gluestack was a part of NativeBase, a component library for both React and React Native. With performance and maintainability in mind, NativeBase was split into two parts, focusing on a universal... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Best headless UI libraries in React Native
    Just like the other libraries mentioned in this article, Gluestack is another unstyled component library. Originally a part of NativeBase, the developer team created this library to prevent bloat and enhance maintainability of the project. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • An Overview of 25+ UI Component Libraries in 2023
    KumaUI : Another relatively new contender, Kuma uses zero runtime CSS-in-JS to create headless UI components which allows a lot of flexibility. It was heavily inspired by other zero runtime CSS-in-JS solutions such as PandaCSS, Vanilla Extract, and Linaria, as well as by Styled System, ChakraUI, and Native Base. ### Vue. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • 7 Popular React Native UI Component Libraries You Should Know
    NativeBase is a collection of essential cross-platform React Native components. The components are built with React Native combined with some JavaScript functionality with customizable properties. NativeBase is fully open-source and has 18,000+ stars on GitHub. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • React vs React Native: How Different Are They, Really?
    CSS-based UI libs don't make sense on mobile; your new options include NativeBase, React Native Elements and others). Some web-based UI libs do have RN siblings though - such as React Native Material and React Native Paper (for Material-UI), and tailwind-rn (for Tailwind). This just means new decisions to make, some learning, and new paradigms for how to use the new libs. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AppWrite and NativeBase, you can also consider the following products

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

React Native Desktop - Build OS X desktop apps using React Native

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

React Native UI Kitten - Customizable and reusable react-native component kit

PocketBase.io - Open Source backend with realtime database, authentication, file storage and admin dashboard, all compiled in 1 portable executable.

React Native Paper by Callstack - Material Design for React Native (Android & iOS)

Loading...