AppLaunchpad VS mozjpeg

Not OP, but have a look at [0]. It’s not great, but good enough. I regularly use it for App Store screenshots with captions and text. [0] https://theapplaunchpad.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

For an advanced approach that includes localizations of your text and a ton of included resources to build your designs off of, there is AppLaunchPad (which has both a screenshot version and a mockup version with free and pay-by-the-month options), there is Vernissage which has a free and a pretty cheap pro version, and then there's App-Mockup which is free web-app. Source: over 1 year ago

I used this. Paid for one month and got a good use out of it. https://theapplaunchpad.com. Source: over 2 years ago

I used AppLaunchPad. It’s a paid service but you can go monthly for single months when you need it (US$ 29). And you can easily wrap device frames for different size and colors of iPhone and iPad around the standard screenshots that you supply. Source: over 2 years ago

It would be nice if the author would add mozjpeg[1] to the comparison. At certain sizes, it can produce smaller sizes than WebP, and because it is still a jpeg, it has a much better compatibility story, which the author alluded to. [1]https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Image-shrinker is a simple, easy to use open source tool for shrinking images. Under the hood it uses pngquant, mozjpg, SVGO, and gifsicle. You can also install these tools individually if you need to compress some images. I often use pngquantafter exporting PNGs for web projects from Figma or similar tools. I literally run it like this:. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

> MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-encoder-proj.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

FWIW, Mozilla has been maintaining their own fork for quite a while now[1] AFAIK most Linux Distros have been using libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg, after some drama in ~2010 where libjpeg came under new management, decided to break ABI/API several times over and add incompatible, non-standard format extensions[2]. [1] https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

No. See https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg Also, there is a fairly big problem with JPG that the ‘quality’ setting is not calibrated. That is you might look at one image and think it looks fine (which is subjective, depends on what you want to use the image for…) with a quality of 60%, but then you compress a million images at that rate, delete the originals, then... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago