Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AppImageKit VS YUM Package Manager

Compare AppImageKit VS YUM Package Manager and see what are their differences

AppImageKit logo AppImageKit

Linux apps that run anywhere

YUM Package Manager logo YUM Package Manager

Yum is an automatic updater and package installer/remover for rpm systems.
  • AppImageKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18
  • YUM Package Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-07

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AppImageKit and YUM Package Manager)
Front End Package Manager
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Package Manager
0 0%
100% 100
Software Marketplace
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using AppImageKit and YUM Package Manager. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppImageKit seems to be a lot more popular than YUM Package Manager. While we know about 52 links to AppImageKit, we've tracked only 1 mention of YUM Package Manager. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AppImageKit mentions (52)

  • GoboLinux
    What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Bitwarden Heist – How to Break into Password Vaults Without Using Passwords
    Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best CLI installation experience you've ever seen?
    There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file. [1] https://appimage.org. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Linux users when their preferred app isn't packaged in the main repository
    Nah I think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard. Source: 11 months ago
  • How to minimize RAM usage during Go binary compilation
    Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins. Source: 11 months ago
View more

YUM Package Manager mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AppImageKit and YUM Package Manager, you can also consider the following products

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Yarn - Yarn is a package manager for your code.

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.

Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.