Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apphive VS Xamarin.Android

Compare Apphive VS Xamarin.Android and see what are their differences

Apphive logo Apphive

AppHive is an app builder | The easiest way to make an app for android and IOS, you can create free mobile app without programming, drag and drop elements, build an app in minutes, you can create applications like Uber or Airbnb, Apphive is the and…

Xamarin.Android logo Xamarin.Android

Integrated environment for building not only native Android but iOS and Windows apps too.
  • Apphive Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06
  • Xamarin.Android Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06

Apphive features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Apphive provides a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, which allows users without coding expertise to build mobile applications efficiently.
  • Pre-built Templates
    The platform offers a variety of pre-built templates and components that streamline the app development process, saving time and effort.
  • Cost-Effective
    Apphive offers affordable pricing plans, making it accessible for startups and small businesses looking to create apps without significant financial investment.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Apphive supports the development of apps for both Android and iOS platforms, helping reach a wider audience with minimal extra development effort.
  • Community and Resources
    The platform has a supportive community and a wealth of learning resources, including tutorials, forums, and customer support, aiding users in resolving issues and enhancing their skills.

Possible disadvantages of Apphive

  • Limited Customization
    While the drag-and-drop interface is user-friendly, it may limit the level of customization and flexibility available to developers who need more advanced features.
  • Performance Constraints
    Apps built using no-code platforms like Apphive might face performance issues or limitations compared to those developed through traditional coding methods.
  • Dependence on Platform
    Using Apphive ties users to the platform's ecosystem, which may pose challenges if users wish to migrate their app to another service or require features that Apphive does not support.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basics are easy to grasp, users might encounter a learning curve when attempting to implement more complex functionality or integrations.
  • Subscription Costs
    Though initially cost-effective, ongoing subscription fees can add up over time, potentially making Apphive more expensive than anticipated for long-term projects.

Xamarin.Android features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Development
    Xamarin.Android allows developers to write for multiple platforms using a single codebase, facilitating code reuse and reducing development time and costs.
  • Native Performance
    Applications built with Xamarin.Android can achieve near-native performance levels, leveraging platform-specific APIs and hardware capabilities.
  • Shared Codebase
    Developers can share a large portion of their code across different platforms (i.e., Android, iOS, Windows), simplifying maintenance and updates.
  • Access to .NET Libraries
    Xamarin.Android enables the use of the extensive .NET ecosystem and libraries, providing a robust and well-supported development environment.
  • Strong Integration with Visual Studio
    Xamarin offers seamless integration with Visual Studio, allowing developers to use familiar tools and workflows to debug, test, and deploy their applications.

Possible disadvantages of Xamarin.Android

  • Overhead and Package Size
    Xamarin.Android applications can have larger package sizes and extra overhead compared to natively developed applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers coming from a purely native Android development background (Java/Kotlin) may face a steep learning curve when transitioning to C# and the Xamarin framework.
  • Limited Access to Latest Features
    Sometimes there may be delays in gaining access to the latest Android features and updates, as Xamarin bindings need to be updated to support them.
  • Performance Overheads
    While near-native performance is achievable, there may be some performance overheads especially with complex applications requiring extensive platform-specific optimizations.
  • Community and Support
    Although Xamarin has a dedicated community, it is smaller compared to native Android development communities, which may result in fewer resources and less community support.

Apphive videos

What is Apphive? That´s an amazing platform

More videos:

  • Review - ¿Eres nuevo en Apphive? | Primeros pasos

Xamarin.Android videos

No Xamarin.Android videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apphive and Xamarin.Android)
OS & Utilities
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
20 20%
80% 80
Mobile App Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apphive and Xamarin.Android. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Xamarin.Android should be more popular than Apphive. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apphive mentions (3)

  • I'm creating a free tutorial to create a delivery app on youtube #nocode
    Apphive (https://apphive.io) has a lot of possibilities since you can create very customizable logic without code. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • what platform to choose if we are to build a simple carpooling app?
    You can try Apphive (https://apphive.io) they also have showcases with similar apps, and there is a marketplace (https://marketplace.apphive.io) with ready to launch templates. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Can I upload NoCode app to Google play store
    With Apphive (https://apphive.io) you can export and publish your apps to Apps Store and Play Store. Source: almost 3 years ago

Xamarin.Android mentions (6)

  • Why is Android Development so difficult/complex? (compared to Web and Desktop)
    Take a look at https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/mobile. It will allow you to write Android apps in C# in Visual Studio. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Stop EU Chat Control
    > It's not hardware. So now are kernel extensions also “applications”? > VSCode is an app that needs the .NET runtime, in order to run the code you write in e.g. C#. You could not possibly be more wrong. VSCode is written in Typescript. It is an Electron app. There have been cross platform JS frameworks that ran on iOS for a decade. Besides that, it’s been years since you have needed the .Net runtime to run... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • this sub in a nutshell
    Ah, so C# (and .NET) does have its answer to Qt, point taken. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Which programming language to learn next (as a competitive programer before college)?
    C# can be used for mobile and macOS - https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/xamarin/mobile-apps. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How good is .Net Core for iOS apps?
    Iric that’s only possible with Microsoft Xamarin. Never used it, rarely hear about it. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apphive and Xamarin.Android, you can also consider the following products

AppMySite - An automated no-code app builder

RAD Studio - RAD Studio 10.2 with Delphi Linux compiler is the fastest way to write, compile, package and deploy cross-platform native software applications. Learn more.

AppyPie AppMakr - AppMakr is a browser-based platform designed to make creating your own iPhone app quick and easy.

Rider - Rider is a cross-platform .NET IDE based on the IntelliJ platform and ReSharper.

AppyBuilder - An App Inventor 2 spin-off. Formerly called AILiveComplete.

Qt Creator - Qt Creator is a cross-platform C++, JavaScript and QML integrated development environment. It is the fastest, easiest and most fun experience a C++ developer could wish for.