Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache ZooKeeper VS Wildfly

Compare Apache ZooKeeper VS Wildfly and see what are their differences

Apache ZooKeeper logo Apache ZooKeeper

Apache ZooKeeper is an effort to develop and maintain an open-source server which enables highly reliable distributed coordination.

Wildfly logo Wildfly

WildFly is a flexible, lightweight application server.
  • Apache ZooKeeper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • Wildfly Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

Apache ZooKeeper features and specs

  • High Availability
    ZooKeeper is designed to be highly available, with built-in redundancy and failover mechanisms that ensure minimal downtime.
  • Consistency
    It follows a strict consistency model, ensuring that reads reflect the most recent writes, which is crucial for coordination and configuration management.
  • Scalability
    ZooKeeper can handle a high number of read operations and can be scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the ensemble.
  • Leader Election
    ZooKeeper simplifies the implementation of leader election processes, making it easier to design fault-tolerant distributed systems.
  • Cluster Management
    It aids in cluster management by providing mechanisms to track the status and configuration of nodes across a distributed system.
  • Watch Mechanism
    ZooKeeper provides a watch mechanism that allows clients to be notified of data changes, helping to keep state synchronized across systems.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ZooKeeper

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a ZooKeeper ensemble can be complex, requiring careful configuration and maintenance.
  • Resource Intensive
    ZooKeeper can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and CPU, especially in large deployments.
  • Write Performance
    While read operations are very fast, write operations can be slower due to the need to achieve consensus among ZooKeeper nodes.
  • Operational Overhead
    Managing ZooKeeper involves operational overhead, including monitoring, backups, and handling node failures.
  • Limited Programming Language Support
    Although ZooKeeper supports many major languages, the client libraries for some languages may not be as mature or well-supported as those for others.
  • Transaction Size
    ZooKeeper is not designed for very large data or complex transactions, limiting its use cases to lightweight coordination tasks.

Wildfly features and specs

  • High Performance
    WildFly is designed to deliver exceptional performance, with fast startup times and efficient resource utilization, making it ideal for high-throughput applications.
  • Modular Design
    WildFly uses a modular architecture based on Java modules, which allows for a highly customizable and flexible server environment. This modularity helps in better resource management and optimization.
  • Java EE Compliance
    WildFly is fully compliant with the latest Java EE (Jakarta EE) specifications, ensuring that enterprise applications can leverage the full set of standardized features and APIs provided by the platform.
  • Active Community and Support
    WildFly benefits from a large and active community, as well as strong support from Red Hat, which provides commercial support through its enterprise version, JBoss EAP. This ensures continuous improvement and timely updates.
  • Flexible Configuration
    WildFly offers flexible configuration options through its management interfaces – CLI, web-based console, and REST APIs – allowing administrators to manage and configure the server efficiently.
  • Lightweight
    WildFly is lightweight compared to other enterprise-level application servers, making it suitable for cloud-native deployments and microservices architecture.

Possible disadvantages of Wildfly

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and configurations available in WildFly can make it complex and challenging for new users or those with limited experience in managing application servers.
  • Documentation
    While WildFly has comprehensive documentation, some users find it less intuitive and difficult to navigate, especially when troubleshooting specific issues or advanced configuration.
  • Memory Consumption
    Although WildFly is designed to be performant, it can be memory-intensive, particularly for large-scale applications with numerous modules and services.
  • Frequent Updates
    WildFly undergoes frequent updates and changes, which can sometimes lead to compatibility issues or require additional effort to keep up with the latest versions and patches.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The advanced features and capabilities of WildFly come with a steep learning curve, necessitating a significant investment in time and effort to master the platform effectively.

Apache ZooKeeper videos

Why do we use Apache Zookeeper?

More videos:

  • Review - 4.5. Apache Zookeeper | Hands-On - Getting Started

Wildfly videos

Wildfly 8 Launch Community Presentation

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Run Wildfly on CentOS 7

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache ZooKeeper and Wildfly)
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
48 48%
52% 52
Application Server
37 37%
63% 63
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache ZooKeeper and Wildfly. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache ZooKeeper and Wildfly

Apache ZooKeeper Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache ZooKeeper yet.
Be the first one to post

Wildfly Reviews

Top 10 Open Source Java and JavaEE Application Servers
Wildfly also supports web services like JAX-WSJDBCLoad balancing, and includes a Management API, a OSGi frameworkRMI-IIOP and can be executed in two server modes: a traditional, single JVM, standalone mode, and a multi-JVM option, Domain mode, which synchronizes configuration across any number of processes and hosts.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache ZooKeeper seems to be a lot more popular than Wildfly. While we know about 32 links to Apache ZooKeeper, we've tracked only 1 mention of Wildfly. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache ZooKeeper mentions (32)

View more

Wildfly mentions (1)

  • I am making an RPM package of Wildfly servlet 26.1.3, it keeps asking for ancient glibc
    User@opensuse:~/rpmbuild> cat SPECS/wildfly-26.1.3.spec %define _topdir /home/user/rpmbuild Name: wildfly-servlet Version: 26.1.3.Final Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: WildFly 26.1.3 Application Server License: Apache License, Version 2.0 URL: https://wildfly.org/ Source0: https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/releases/download/26.1.3.Final/wildfly-servlet-26.1.3.Final.tar.gz #BuildRequires:... Source: about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache ZooKeeper and Wildfly, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Forge - Static web hosting made simple

Phusion Passenger - Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx