Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache ZooKeeper VS AWS Elastic Load Balancing

Compare Apache ZooKeeper VS AWS Elastic Load Balancing and see what are their differences

Apache ZooKeeper logo Apache ZooKeeper

Apache ZooKeeper is an effort to develop and maintain an open-source server which enables highly reliable distributed coordination.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing logo AWS Elastic Load Balancing

Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.
  • Apache ZooKeeper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • AWS Elastic Load Balancing Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27

Apache ZooKeeper features and specs

  • High Availability
    ZooKeeper is designed to be highly available, with built-in redundancy and failover mechanisms that ensure minimal downtime.
  • Consistency
    It follows a strict consistency model, ensuring that reads reflect the most recent writes, which is crucial for coordination and configuration management.
  • Scalability
    ZooKeeper can handle a high number of read operations and can be scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the ensemble.
  • Leader Election
    ZooKeeper simplifies the implementation of leader election processes, making it easier to design fault-tolerant distributed systems.
  • Cluster Management
    It aids in cluster management by providing mechanisms to track the status and configuration of nodes across a distributed system.
  • Watch Mechanism
    ZooKeeper provides a watch mechanism that allows clients to be notified of data changes, helping to keep state synchronized across systems.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ZooKeeper

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a ZooKeeper ensemble can be complex, requiring careful configuration and maintenance.
  • Resource Intensive
    ZooKeeper can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and CPU, especially in large deployments.
  • Write Performance
    While read operations are very fast, write operations can be slower due to the need to achieve consensus among ZooKeeper nodes.
  • Operational Overhead
    Managing ZooKeeper involves operational overhead, including monitoring, backups, and handling node failures.
  • Limited Programming Language Support
    Although ZooKeeper supports many major languages, the client libraries for some languages may not be as mature or well-supported as those for others.
  • Transaction Size
    ZooKeeper is not designed for very large data or complex transactions, limiting its use cases to lightweight coordination tasks.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS Elastic Load Balancing can automatically distribute incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, and IP addresses, promoting application elasticity.
  • Health Monitoring
    It continually checks the health of the registered targets, ensuring that traffic is routed only to healthy instances.
  • Security
    Integrated with AWS's Certificate Manager and Application Load Balancer, allowing easy deployment of SSL/TLS for secure communication.
  • Flexibility
    Supports various types of load balancers: Application, Network, and Classic, each suited to different types of application architectures and requirements.
  • Cost-effective
    Pay-as-you-go pricing model ensures you only pay for the resources you use, which can lead to cost savings compared to a fixed-cost solution.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as Auto Scaling, Route 53, CloudWatch, and more for a more robust solution.

Possible disadvantages of AWS Elastic Load Balancing

  • Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for users unfamiliar with AWS services and cloud architecture.
  • Cost
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective, the charges can ramp up quickly, especially for high-traffic applications.
  • Dependence on AWS Ecosystem
    Highly integrated with AWS services, making it less ideal for multi-cloud or hybrid cloud environments.
  • Latency
    In some cases, the load balancer can introduce a slight increase in latency, which might be a concern for latency-sensitive applications.
  • Configuration Limitations
    Some specific configurations and customizations may not be possible, leading to constraints on certain types of applications.

Apache ZooKeeper videos

Why do we use Apache Zookeeper?

More videos:

  • Review - 4.5. Apache Zookeeper | Hands-On - Getting Started

AWS Elastic Load Balancing videos

No AWS Elastic Load Balancing videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache ZooKeeper and AWS Elastic Load Balancing)
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
47 47%
53% 53
Application Server
100 100%
0% 0
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache ZooKeeper and AWS Elastic Load Balancing. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Apache ZooKeeper might be a bit more popular than AWS Elastic Load Balancing. We know about 32 links to it since March 2021 and only 25 links to AWS Elastic Load Balancing. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache ZooKeeper mentions (32)

View more

AWS Elastic Load Balancing mentions (25)

  • Basic AWS Elastic Load Balancer Setup
    Load balancers can be categorized to different types depending on their use cases. On a broader classification, we can divide load balancers into three different categories based on how they are deployed. 1. Hardware load balancers - Dedicated physical appliances designed for high-performance traffic distribution. They are often used by large scale enterprises and data centers that require minimum latency and... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Work Stealing: Load-balancing for compute-heavy tasks
    When a backend starts or stops, something needs to update, whether it’s Consul, kube-proxy, ELB, or otherwise. To stop a worker without incurring failures, you need to prevent the load balancer from sending new requests and then finishing existing ones. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Load Balancers in AWS
    In this way, you can create a load balancer and custom rules using AWS Elastic Load Balancer. You can refer the official user guide to learn more about load balancing in AWS. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • A Ride Through Optimising Legacy Spring Boot Services For High Throughput
    Use load balancers and distribute load accordingly to your redundant spring boot services. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DevSecOps with AWS- Ephemeral Environments – Creating test Environments On-Demand - Part 1
    • Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a fully managed container orchestration service that helps you easily deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications. • AWS Fargate is a serverless, pay-as-you-go compute engine that lets you focus on building applications without managing servers. AWS Fargate is compatible with both Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and Amazon Elastic... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache ZooKeeper and AWS Elastic Load Balancing, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Traefik - Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Google Cloud Load Balancing - Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.