Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache ZooKeeper VS ASP.NET

Compare Apache ZooKeeper VS ASP.NET and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache ZooKeeper logo Apache ZooKeeper

Apache ZooKeeper is an effort to develop and maintain an open-source server which enables highly reliable distributed coordination.

ASP.NET logo ASP.NET

ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.
  • Apache ZooKeeper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • ASP.NET Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-29

Apache ZooKeeper features and specs

  • High Availability
    ZooKeeper is designed to be highly available, with built-in redundancy and failover mechanisms that ensure minimal downtime.
  • Consistency
    It follows a strict consistency model, ensuring that reads reflect the most recent writes, which is crucial for coordination and configuration management.
  • Scalability
    ZooKeeper can handle a high number of read operations and can be scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the ensemble.
  • Leader Election
    ZooKeeper simplifies the implementation of leader election processes, making it easier to design fault-tolerant distributed systems.
  • Cluster Management
    It aids in cluster management by providing mechanisms to track the status and configuration of nodes across a distributed system.
  • Watch Mechanism
    ZooKeeper provides a watch mechanism that allows clients to be notified of data changes, helping to keep state synchronized across systems.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ZooKeeper

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a ZooKeeper ensemble can be complex, requiring careful configuration and maintenance.
  • Resource Intensive
    ZooKeeper can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and CPU, especially in large deployments.
  • Write Performance
    While read operations are very fast, write operations can be slower due to the need to achieve consensus among ZooKeeper nodes.
  • Operational Overhead
    Managing ZooKeeper involves operational overhead, including monitoring, backups, and handling node failures.
  • Limited Programming Language Support
    Although ZooKeeper supports many major languages, the client libraries for some languages may not be as mature or well-supported as those for others.
  • Transaction Size
    ZooKeeper is not designed for very large data or complex transactions, limiting its use cases to lightweight coordination tasks.

ASP.NET features and specs

  • Performance
    ASP.NET is known for its high performance and scalability. It compiles server-side code to DLL files, which is executed on the server side, thereby speeding up the application's response time.
  • Security
    ASP.NET provides built-in security features like form authentication and Windows authentication, as well as protection against common threats such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and request forgery.
  • Rich Toolbox
    Visual Studio, the Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for ASP.NET, offers a rich toolbox with a plethora of controls, automatic deployment features, and other tools that significantly speed up development.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform framework, which means you can run your web applications on Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Community and Support
    ASP.NET has a strong community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to problems and ensuring continuous improvement and support.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET

  • Learning Curve
    The framework can be complex for beginners, especially those without experience in C# or the .NET ecosystem.
  • Cost
    While ASP.NET Core is free and open-source, some advanced features and tools require a Visual Studio subscription, which can be expensive.
  • Hosting
    Although ASP.NET Core has improved in terms of cross-platform hosting, traditional ASP.NET applications are primarily optimized for Windows servers, limiting hosting options.
  • Resource Intensive
    ASP.NET applications can be more resource-intensive than applications built with some other frameworks, which can lead to higher infrastructure costs.
  • Complexity
    The framework offers a lot of features and functionalities, which can sometimes make it overly complex and harder to manage for smaller projects.

Apache ZooKeeper videos

+ Add

Why do we use Apache Zookeeper?

More videos:

  • Review - 4.5. Apache Zookeeper | Hands-On - Getting Started

ASP.NET videos

+ Add

Build Rating and Review System in ASP.NET MVC and Entity Framework

More videos:

  • Review - ASP.NET MVC - Review 0
  • Review - IMDeanyP Movie Review Site - ASP.NET / C# / SQL Server / MVC / Entity Framework

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache ZooKeeper and ASP.NET)

Apache ZooKeeper

ASP.NET

Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Web Servers
100 100%
Web Servers
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache ZooKeeper and ASP.NET. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache ZooKeeper and ASP.NET

Apache ZooKeeper Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache ZooKeeper yet.
Be the first one to post

ASP.NET Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
ASP.NET’s got that Microsoft muscle, a powerhouse of a framework for building dynamic web services and more. It lets you roll out robust websites with the smoothness that comes with deep pockets. Perfect for .NET software development teams.
Source: tms-outsource.com
Top 10 Phoenix Framework Alternatives
Moving over to the .NET platform, Asp.Net is an open-source web framework developed by Microsoft that allows developers to build dynamic web pages, apps, and services using HTML, JavaScript, and CSS.
Source: blog.back4app.com
10 Ruby on Rails Alternatives For Web Development in 2022
Last but not least, a back-end web framework created by Microsoft for the development of dynamic web pages - ASP.NET. Built on top of C# it is one the fastest frameworks available on the market. ASP.NET is capable of handling 7.01 million requests per second while Django handles only 79,266 requests. The framework is mainly used for building web applications, APIs,...
Source: www.ideamotive.co

Social recommendations and mentions

Apache ZooKeeper might be a bit more popular than ASP.NET. We know about 32 links to it since March 2021 and only 22 links to ASP.NET. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache ZooKeeper mentions (32)

View more

ASP.NET mentions (22)

  • 30,656 Pages of Books About the .NET Ecosystem: C#, Blazor, ASP.NET, & T-SQL
    Most of the books teach C# and .NET, ASP.NET, Blazor, or T-SQL. I also found some .NET-specific coverage of wider topics: architecture and design, concurrency, automated tests, functional programming, and dependency injection. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Diversify Your Tech Stack: Uncovering Powerful Node js Alternatives
    Built by Microsoft, .NET is a high-performance application platform that uses C# for programming. .NET is cross-platform and comes with plenty of libraries and APIs covering collections, networking, and machine learning to build different types of applications. ASP.NET Core widens the .NET developer platform with libraries and tools geared towards web applications. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • C# Fundamentals
    Web Applications: ASP.NET, a powerful framework for building web applications, is primarily based on C#. Developers can create dynamic websites, web APIs, and services with ASP.NET. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release
    The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?
    Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache ZooKeeper and ASP.NET, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Loading...