Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Weex VS mozjpeg

Compare Apache Weex VS mozjpeg and see what are their differences

Apache Weex logo Apache Weex

A framework for building mobile cross-platform UIs

mozjpeg logo mozjpeg

Mozilla JPEG Encoder Project
  • Apache Weex Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-28
  • mozjpeg Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Weex and mozjpeg)
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Game Development
0 0%
100% 100
Rapid Application Development
Game Engine
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Weex and mozjpeg. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mozjpeg seems to be a lot more popular than Apache Weex. While we know about 13 links to mozjpeg, we've tracked only 1 mention of Apache Weex. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Weex mentions (1)

mozjpeg mentions (13)

  • It's the future – you can stop using JPEGs
    It would be nice if the author would add mozjpeg[1] to the comparison. At certain sizes, it can produce smaller sizes than WebP, and because it is still a jpeg, it has a much better compatibility story, which the author alluded to. [1]https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Random Code Inspiration Volume 2
    Image-shrinker is a simple, easy to use open source tool for shrinking images. Under the hood it uses pngquant, mozjpg, SVGO, and gifsicle. You can also install these tools individually if you need to compress some images. I often use pngquantafter exporting PNGs for web projects from Figma or similar tools. I literally run it like this:. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • JPEG XL: How It Started, How It’s Going
    > MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-encoder-proj.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Why there may never be a libjpeg-turbo 3.1
    FWIW, Mozilla has been maintaining their own fork for quite a while now[1] AFAIK most Linux Distros have been using libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg, after some drama in ~2010 where libjpeg came under new management, decided to break ABI/API several times over and add incompatible, non-standard format extensions[2]. [1] https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Are all JPEG compression implementations the same?
    No. See https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg Also, there is a fairly big problem with JPG that the ‘quality’ setting is not calibrated. That is you might look at one image and think it looks fine (which is subjective, depends on what you want to use the image for…) with a quality of 60%, but then you compress a million images at that rate, delete the originals, then... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Weex and mozjpeg, you can also consider the following products

Electron - Build cross platform desktop apps with web technologies

libjpeg-turbo - libjpeg-turbo is a derivative of libjpeg that uses SIMD instructions (MMX, SSE2, NEON) to...

Jayson - Powerful JSON viewer for iPhone and iPad

Guetzli - JPEG encoder from Google Research that aims for great compression with high visual quality.

PH today - A simple realtime view of Product Hunt

libjpeg - libjpeg is a widely-used free software library written in C which implements JPEG decoding and...