Software Alternatives & Reviews

Apache Traffic Server VS TinyProxy

Compare Apache Traffic Server VS TinyProxy and see what are their differences

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.

TinyProxy logo TinyProxy

A lightweight http(s) proxy daemon
  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • TinyProxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-18

Apache Traffic Server videos

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

TinyProxy videos

kodi recording nbc with ffmpeg without tinyproxy - kodi recording videos - 20

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Traffic Server and TinyProxy)
Proxy Server
69 69%
31% 31
Proxy
58 58%
42% 42
DevOps Tools
57 57%
43% 43
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Traffic Server and TinyProxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Traffic Server and TinyProxy

Apache Traffic Server Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Traffic Server yet.
Be the first one to post

TinyProxy Reviews

  1. It was easier to install and use than expected

    Super simple and straight to the point. All I had to do, in a linux server, was this:

    • install it => apt install tinyproxy
    • configure hosts allowed to connect
    • reload configs => service tinyproxy reload
    🏁 Competitors: banu.com TinyProxy, Squid Proxy
    👍 Pros:    Super simple|Easy to use

Social recommendations and mentions

TinyProxy might be a bit more popular than Apache Traffic Server. We know about 5 links to it since March 2021 and only 5 links to Apache Traffic Server. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Traffic Server mentions (5)

  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Isp.netscape.com
    I was curious if I could find anything out about their stack. Turns out they are using something called Apache Traffic Server[0]. > Formerly a commercial product, Yahoo! Donated it to the Apache Foundation [0] http://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

TinyProxy mentions (5)

  • Web Debugging Proxy to Remove Headers from Incoming Requests
    I found Privoxy, and it seems to do what I want, so maybe wondering if anyone would be eager to recommend. There is also Tinyproxy, but it can only add headers not remove them. Source: 6 months ago
  • Chromium Spelunking: Connecting to Proxies
    To test proxying,I'm using tinyproxy, running a very simple config on port 8080. This supports SPDY (HTTP/2), which is a complication I don't really want to consider at this point, but the analysis ends up quite similar to HTTP/1. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • (Noob) Question - Proxy request to vendor requiring static IP
    Set up basic tinyproxy: https://tinyproxy.github.io/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Dailymotion playlist
    Tinyproxy is fairly easy to configure. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to share docker VPN connection
    When you run the proxy container, you'll need to run it using --network=container: which will cause it to share the VPN secured network from your VPN client container. The kind of proxy you run will depend on what proxy settings your devices support. If your devices support SOCKS then you would run a SOCKS proxy which is capable of re-routing all of your device's network traffic to the proxy and, therefor, your... Source: about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Traffic Server and TinyProxy, you can also consider the following products

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

3proxy - 3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

Privoxy - Privoxy helps users to protect their privacy.

CCProxy - Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?

WinGate - WinGate is highly capable web proxy software for Windows: caching, intercepting, forward and reverse proxy with https inspection and SSL offload, SOCKS server, email

Varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator