Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Traffic Server VS Apache Geronimo

Compare Apache Traffic Server VS Apache Geronimo and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.

Apache Geronimo logo Apache Geronimo

Index
  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • Apache Geronimo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-24

Apache Traffic Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Traffic Server

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.

Apache Geronimo features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache Geronimo is an open-source application server, which means it is free to use, modify, and distribute. This reduces cost barriers and encourages community collaboration and innovation.
  • Java EE Compatibility
    Geronimo is designed to support Java Platform, Enterprise Edition (Java EE), which provides a standards-based platform for enterprise applications providing convenience in development and deployment.
  • Modular Architecture
    It has a modular architecture, powered by the Apache GBean framework, that allows users to plug in only the components they need, which can lead to better performance and easier management.
  • Extensive Community Support
    Being part of the Apache Software Foundation, Geronimo has a robust community and access to extensive documentation, mailing lists, and forums for support.
  • Integration with Other Apache Projects
    It integrates well with other Apache projects such as Apache Tomcat, which can be used as its web container, providing versatility and richness in features.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Geronimo

  • Complex Configuration
    Geronimo's flexibility can result in complex configurations that might overwhelm beginner users, especially when compared to more straightforward application servers.
  • Performance Overhead
    While being versatile, the modular design can introduce performance overhead, especially if not properly tuned, which might not suit all high-performance applications.
  • Limited Popularity
    Compared to other application servers like JBoss or GlassFish, Apache Geronimo is less popular, which might result in fewer third-party resources or slower community updates.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The complexity of a full Java EE server combined with its configuration options can result in a steep learning curve for developers who are new to enterprise Java application development.
  • Uncertain Future
    With the rise of lightweight application frameworks and microservices architectures, the traditional Java EE servers like Geronimo may face an uncertain future as industry trends shift.

Apache Traffic Server videos

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Apache Geronimo videos

No Apache Geronimo videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Traffic Server and Apache Geronimo)
Proxy Server
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
Application Server
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Traffic Server and Apache Geronimo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Traffic Server and Apache Geronimo

Apache Traffic Server Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Traffic Server yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache Geronimo Reviews

Top 10 Open Source Java and JavaEE Application Servers
Apache Geronimo is an open source application server developed by the Apache Software Foundation and distributed under the Apache license. Apache Geronimo is compatible with the Java Enterprise Edition (Java EE) 6 specification supports various technologies such as JMS, Enterprise JavaBeans, Connectors, servlets, JSP, JSF, Unified Expression Language and JavaMail. Developers...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Traffic Server seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Traffic Server mentions (6)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server — A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides authentication and basic authorization through plugins. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

Apache Geronimo mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Geronimo yet. Tracking of Apache Geronimo recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Traffic Server and Apache Geronimo, you can also consider the following products

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

3proxy - 3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

Oracle WebLogic - Receive a complimentary technical review and consultation on moving your Oracle WebLogic Server applications into containers.

CCProxy - Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.