Based on our record, locust should be more popular than Apache Tomcat. It has been mentiond 55 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Manual instrumentation allows you to define your Spans within the code itself rather than relying on automatic instrumentation finding the entry point for a trace. Manual instrumentation is especially helpful for applications that don’t use an application server such as Tomcat, JBoss, or Jetty. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
99% is a huge exaggeration. Two essential deployment tools off the top of my head: Https://tomcat.apache.org/ Https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Developer%20Guide.html. Source: about 1 year ago
Do we still enjoy it? We are running many Vaadin apps in production since that first one. If there are not any specific requirements we use a “modular monolith” concept, which fits our stack best. We pack applications as WAR and deploy them under Apache Tomcat. And yes, we enjoy the development process. It’s very straightforward and Vaadin and SpringBoot fit together well. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
JasperReports Server Community requires a Java application server and a database to create a repository in order to work properly. After downloading JRS, the installation process can install Tomcat server and PostgreSQL database automatically for us and the services will run depending on the Jasper server. It's also possible to connect JRS to services already installed on the server. Moreover, while the free... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Don't use an installed copy of Tomcat. The layout can be different than expected and permission problems can appear at the worst time. For one, it needs to be able to write to that conf directory. Download a non-platform-specific "core" zip file from tomcat.apache.org instead. Source: over 1 year ago
Finally, let's compare the response time of the requests. For that, we will use Locust , an open source load testing tool. The tests will run for 5 minutes, and will increase 4 requests per second every second until they reach 1000 requests per second. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Locust: Another open-source tool, Locust is particularly flexible due to its support for Python scripts. It can conduct load tests across multiple machines, making it possible to simulate millions of users simultaneously. An exceptional feature of Locust is its web-based UI, which allows real-time tracking of performance metrics during test execution. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Locust is a perfect tool to use on such occasion:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
So, in theory, we can handle 300 requests per minute on a single server which was the assumption we started with. After this, I decided to play with this configuration and see what we could achieve. But, to go ahead I need a system to measure the metrics of our load testing. So I quickly set up Locust on my system. Locust is an open-source easy to setup load-testing framework. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
The OpenTelemetry Demo is composed of microservices written in different programming languages that talk to each other over gRPC and HTTP; and a load generator which uses Locust to fake user traffic. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows
Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.
Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996
Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service
LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.
gatling.io - Gatling is an open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty