Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Tapestry VS Apache Wicket

Compare Apache Tapestry VS Apache Wicket and see what are their differences

Apache Tapestry logo Apache Tapestry

Apache Tapestry is a programming environment designed to enhance Java scripting. It's produced by Apache Software Foundation, which was founded in 1999 in Maryland. Read more about Apache Tapestry.

Apache Wicket logo Apache Wicket

HelloWorld demonstrates the basic structure of a web application in Wicket. A Label component is used to display a message on the home page for the application. In all the Wicket examples, you have to put all files in the same package directory.
  • Apache Tapestry Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22
  • Apache Wicket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22

Apache Tapestry features and specs

  • Component-Based Design
    Apache Tapestry offers a component-based architecture, which promotes reusable and modular code, making it easier to manage and maintain complex web applications.
  • Convention Over Configuration
    Tapestry reduces the need for extensive configuration files, allowing for a more streamlined development process by using sensible defaults and conventions.
  • Built-in Scalability
    The framework is designed to handle scalability concerns efficiently, providing features like built-in data caching and optimized rendering to support high-performance applications.
  • Live Class Reloading
    Tapestry enables developers to see changes instantly without restarting the server, thanks to its live class reloading feature, which accelerates the development cycle.
  • Robust Community and Documentation
    With an active community and comprehensive documentation, developers can find support and resources easily, which can aid in efficient problem-solving and learning.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Tapestry

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New developers might experience a steep learning curve due to the framework's unique concepts and paradigms, which may differ significantly from more mainstream technologies.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to some other web frameworks, Tapestry has a smaller ecosystem of third-party plugins and extensions, which might limit some functionality and tool integration.
  • Fewer Resources and Examples
    Due to its less widespread use, there are fewer tutorials, examples, and stack overflow questions answered, which can be a challenge for newcomers or when encountering specific issues.
  • Limited IDE Support
    While most major IDEs support Tapestry, the support might not be as robust or feature-rich as with more popular frameworks, potentially affecting productivity.
  • Infrequent Updates
    Tapestry may not receive updates and new features as frequently as other more actively developed frameworks, which can slow down the adoption of new web technologies.

Apache Wicket features and specs

  • Component-based architecture
    Apache Wicket follows a component-based architecture, allowing developers to create reusable components that can be easily maintained and improved over time.
  • POJO-driven development
    Wicket promotes Plain Old Java Object (POJO) development, which simplifies the creation of web applications by reducing the need for extensive XML configurations and boosting productivity with familiar Java paradigms.
  • HTML-centric design
    The framework allows developers to start with pure HTML and then add dynamic behavior, leading to cleaner separation of concerns and easier markup manipulation.
  • Strong type checking
    Wicket provides strong type checking at compile time, which leads to fewer runtime errors and increases code safety and reliability.
  • Built-in AJAX support
    Wicket seamlessly integrates AJAX functionality, allowing developers to create rich internet applications with minimal effort.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Wicket

  • Steep learning curve
    The component-based approach and the specific conventions used in Wicket might require a significant learning period, especially for those who are new to component-driven web frameworks.
  • Less popularity
    Although Wicket has a dedicated community, it is not as widely adopted as some other Java web frameworks, which might result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations.
  • Statefulness
    Wicket's stateful nature can lead to increased memory usage and potentially slower performance compared to stateless web frameworks, which might be important for applications with a large number of concurrent users.
  • Complexity in large applications
    As the size and scope of a Wicket application grow, the complexity of managing components and their interactions can also increase, making it harder to maintain without careful planning and architecture.

Apache Tapestry videos

No Apache Tapestry videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Apache Wicket videos

Apache wicket: 1 start

More videos:

  • Review - Apache wicket: 12 LifeCycle

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Tapestry and Apache Wicket)
Web Frameworks
27 27%
73% 73
Developer Tools
29 29%
71% 71
Python Web Framework
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Tapestry and Apache Wicket. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Tapestry and Apache Wicket

Apache Tapestry Reviews

17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
You can write Tapestry pages and components as plain old Java objects (POJOs), so you can access the entire Java ecosystem from the framework. Besides Java, Tapestry also supports the Groovy and Scala programming languages and integrates with other Java frameworks such as Hibernate and Spring. Tapestry has been built with performance in mind; therefore it provides you with...
Source: raygun.com

Apache Wicket Reviews

17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
Tapestry is a component-based Java framework with which you can create scalable web applications. Its focus on reusable components makes it architecturally similar to Jakarta Faces and Apache Wicket (see both above). Like Struts and Wicket, Tapestry is also a project of the Apache Software Foundation.
Source: raygun.com
10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
Apache Wicket is a component-based application development framework developed by Jonathan Locke. It is one of the most recently developed Java frameworks.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Wicket should be more popular than Apache Tapestry. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Tapestry mentions (1)

  • Why is Java templating/server rendering losing ground?
    Or good old https://tapestry.apache.org/. Source: about 3 years ago

Apache Wicket mentions (10)

  • Show HN: Latudio – a language acquisition app with a listening-oriented approach
    - like Sentences exercise, but you can select your own set of sentences. You can also set goals and view statistics about your progress. None of this would be possible without the great help from hundreds of our contributors [3], who translated, mapped and recorded content. All the content you find in the app was reviewed multiple times by several people and recordings are made by native speakers. No story in the... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • We're breaking up with JavaScript front ends
    Sort of sounds like Apache Wicket (https://wicket.apache.org/). I used it for a few projects in the mid-late 2000s. I really liked it being server side and the concept of having object-oriented HTML (code paired with HTML snippets). I haven't had a need to use it since 2014, so haven't kept up with the project. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Can I use Java to build a website?
    You can use Java for Backend and Frontend. A relative new kid on the block for Frontend is Qute. The general keyword you are searching for is Java Templating Engine. Specific examples would be Thymeleaf or FreeMarker. There are some framework, which offer a lot more than templating like Vaadin or Wicket. Some are just specifications like Jakarta Faces with some of their implementations MyFaces or Mojarra. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Getting back into Java after 12-15 years away?
    Perhaps, a good competitor for JSF is Apache Wicket. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Options for high level front-end frameworks for Java developers
    I have used https://wicket.apache.org/ in the past and I think it matches your needs. It's a simple mvc that focuses on the actual java code writing and uses html only on the layout of your components in your page. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Tapestry and Apache Wicket, you can also consider the following products

Grails - An Open Source, full stack, web application framework for the JVM

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.

Vaadin Framework - Vaadin is a web application framework for Rich Internet Applications (RIA).

Apache Struts - Apache Struts is an open-source web application framework for developing Java EE web applications.

Play Framework - An open source web framework which follows the model-view-controller architecture. It is light-weight, web-friendly, and stateless. It provides minimal overhead for highly-scalable applications.

Apache OFBiz - Apache OFBiz is a set of applications designed for businesses.