Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Subversion VS GitLive

Compare Apache Subversion VS GitLive and see what are their differences

Apache Subversion logo Apache Subversion

Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitLive logo GitLive

Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers
  • Apache Subversion Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27
  • GitLive Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-08

📣 The future of social coding

Connect. ◾️See when your fellow contributors are online and which repos, branches and files they are working on. Automated. ◾️Connect your issue tracker to share what issue you are working on based on your current branch.

📣 Resolve conflicts before they happen

Live. ◾️ See others' local changes in the gutter of your editor and get notified the moment you make a conflicting change. Patch. ◾️View diffs of other contributors' local files and cherry‑pick individual lines, files or complete working copies.

📣 Code together in real‑time

Codeshare. ◾️Make voice and video calls directly from your editor and codeshare to see each others cursors.
Agnostic. ◾️Edit together simultaneously, interoperable between VS Code and all JetBrains IDEs.

Apache Subversion features and specs

  • Centralized Version Control
    Apache Subversion (SVN) uses a centralized repository model, which makes it easy to manage and control all project files in one place. All history and versions are stored on the server, making backup and repository management straightforward.
  • Atomic Commits
    Subversion ensures that commits are atomic operations. This means that either all changes in a commit are applied, or none are, helping to maintain the integrity of the repository.
  • Comprehensive Authorization
    SVN offers fine-grained authentication and authorization models. It can integrate with various authentication systems and allows granular access control on a per-directory and per-user basis.
  • Binary File Handling
    SVN handles binary files more efficiently compared to some other version control systems, reducing the size of repositories and improving performance when large files are committed.
  • Mature and Stable
    SVN has been around since 2000 and is widely used in enterprise settings. It is stable, well-documented, and has a vast community for support.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Subversion

  • Limited Branching and Merging
    SVN’s branching and merging capabilities are more cumbersome compared to distributed version control systems (DVCS) like Git. Merging in SVN can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Single Point of Failure
    As a centralized version control system, the SVN repository server becomes a single point of failure. If the server goes down, no commits can be made until it is back up.
  • Performance Overhead
    Working with a remote central repository can introduce latency and performance overhead, especially with large projects and many users.
  • Less support for Offline Work
    SVN generally requires network access to the central repository for most operations. This makes it less flexible for developers needing to work offline, compared to DVCS where local copies are complete repositories.
  • Complex Repository Management
    Managing SVN repositories, particularly for large projects, can become complex and may require significant administrative effort to handle repositories, backups, and access controls.

GitLive features and specs

  • Real time collaboration
  • Communication & Notifications
  • Code Editor

Analysis of Apache Subversion

Overall verdict

  • Apache Subversion is a solid choice for projects that require a centralized version control system with robust access controls and support for large file handling. While it may not offer the distributed features and branching flexibility of systems like Git, it remains a reliable and efficient tool for many development environments.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system that provides a simple model for versioning, which can be easier to understand for users who prefer a linear, sequential history of changes. It ensures a single source of truth and is well-suited for teams that require tight access control over the repository. SVN is also known for handling large files and binary files better than some distributed systems.

Recommended for

  • Organizations with strict version control policies
  • Teams that need centralized control over versioning
  • Projects with large binary files that need versioning
  • Users who are more comfortable with a sequential workflow

Apache Subversion videos

Setting Up Apache Subversion on Windows

GitLive videos

Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Subversion and GitLive)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
65 65%
35% 35
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Version Control
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Subversion and GitLive. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitLive seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Subversion mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Subversion yet. Tracking of Apache Subversion recommendations started around May 2021.

GitLive mentions (3)

  • Building Remote Teams for Startups
    There are plenty of tools that have started popping up to try and improve this situation since last year. CodeTogether, Duckly, Code With Me, and GitLive to name a few. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Dev resources and articles plus news from Huawei's Android alternative HarmonyOS, Mozilla launches MDN Plus, and more.
    GitLive. Extend your IDE with the real-time features remote development teams need to work together effectively. See what your teammates are working on and get notified of merge conflicts before you commit. Make video calls and code together live, VS Code to JetBrains. [GITLIVE]. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Closest too to intellij conflict resolution?
    This is in no way an answer to your question but perhaps you would find git.live's merge conflict detection feature useful to potentially avoid the conflicts in the first place 😅. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Subversion and GitLive, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

CodeStream - CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Codebeat for iOS - Automated code review for iOS

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

GitDuck - GitDuck is the easiest way to explain your code to other developers. Show how you code and record videos linked to your source code.