Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Pulsar VS Amazon MQ

Compare Apache Pulsar VS Amazon MQ and see what are their differences

Apache Pulsar logo Apache Pulsar

Apache Pulsar is an open-source, distributed messaging and streaming platform built for the cloud.

Amazon MQ logo Amazon MQ

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Easily migrate messaging.
  • Apache Pulsar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-12-17
  • Amazon MQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-24

Apache Pulsar videos

Introduction to Apache Pulsar Basics

Amazon MQ videos

Getting Started with Amazon MQ - Managed Message Broker Service

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Pulsar and Amazon MQ)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100
Data Integration
34 34%
66% 66
Web Service Automation
31 31%
69% 69

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Pulsar and Amazon MQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Pulsar and Amazon MQ

Apache Pulsar Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
Pulsar also provides a rich set of client libraries for various programming languages, making it easy to build messaging and streaming applications using Pulsar. Apache Pulsar is a popular choice for real-time data processing and messaging in large-scale data processing applications, such as those used in the financial, telecommunications, and internet-of-things industries.
Source: docs.vanus.ai

Amazon MQ Reviews

We have no reviews of Amazon MQ yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Amazon MQ might be a bit more popular than Apache Pulsar. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Apache Pulsar. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Pulsar mentions (1)

  • Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
    Stream-processing platforms such as Apache Kafka, Apache Pulsar, or Redpanda are specifically engineered to foster event-driven communication in a distributed system and they can be a great choice for developing loosely coupled applications. Stream processing platforms analyze data in motion, offering near-zero latency advantages. For example, consider an alert system for monitoring factory equipment. If a... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

Amazon MQ mentions (1)

  • AWS in Plain English
    > Is there a more complex queuing service? No. There’s only SQS. Yes there is: https://aws.amazon.com/amazon-mq/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Pulsar and Amazon MQ, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

NATS - NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.

Memphis - Highly scalable, and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming applications fast.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Redpanda - Redpanda is a powerful, yet simple, and cost-efficient streaming data platform that is compatible with Kafka® APIs while eliminating Kafka complexity.