Software Alternatives & Reviews

Apache Portable Runtime VS containerd

Compare Apache Portable Runtime VS containerd and see what are their differences

Apache Portable Runtime logo Apache Portable Runtime

The Apache Portable Runtime (APR) is a supporting library for the Apache web server.

containerd logo containerd

An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
  • Apache Portable Runtime Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16
  • containerd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-15

Apache Portable Runtime videos

No Apache Portable Runtime videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

containerd videos

Deep Dive: containerd - Derek McGowan, Docker & Phil Estes, IBM Cloud

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Portable Runtime and containerd)
Cloud Storage
32 32%
68% 68
Cloud Computing
22 22%
78% 78
Storage
47 47%
53% 53
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Portable Runtime and containerd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Portable Runtime and containerd

Apache Portable Runtime Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Portable Runtime yet.
Be the first one to post

containerd Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
containerd is described as “an industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability.” An incubating project of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, containerd is available as a daemon for Linux or Windows.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, containerd seems to be a lot more popular than Apache Portable Runtime. While we know about 45 links to containerd, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Apache Portable Runtime. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Portable Runtime mentions (4)

  • My review of the C standard library in practice
    There are many libraries available that you can use as a libc replacement instead of CCAN, if that’s what you prefer [1-3]. Taking on a beefy dependency like that can be overkill, though, if all you need is a linked list or dynamic array implementation. [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/ [2] http://apr.apache.org/ [3] https://libcork.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Is there a custom "C Standard Library" out there?
    There are many. APR is one of them. APR stands for Apache Portable Runtime. It includes arrays(aprarray) and hash tables(aprhash), but not trees. Source: over 1 year ago
  • A C Standard Library
    A library that already implements some of this called libapr is what I’d consider a good example of libraries of this Ilk. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Git's list of banned C functions
    It's not really complacency: it's that the standard library is intentionally minimalistic to maintain portability and backwards compatibility. If you want sensible string handling, it's usually best to use a high level utility library like GLib(https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/) or Apache Portable Runtime(http://apr.apache.org/), or roll your own safe string type (preferably non-null terminating). - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

containerd mentions (45)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Portable Runtime and containerd, you can also consider the following products

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

rkt - App Container runtime

CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

REX-Ray - Runtime

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.