Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache Karaf VS Google Site Reliability Engineering

Compare Apache Karaf VS Google Site Reliability Engineering and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Karaf logo Apache Karaf

Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Google Site Reliability Engineering logo Google Site Reliability Engineering

How Google runs production systems
  • Apache Karaf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-29
  • Google Site Reliability Engineering Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14

Apache Karaf features and specs

  • Modular architecture
    Apache Karaf features a highly modular architecture that allows users to deploy, control, and monitor applications in a flexible and efficient manner. This makes it easy to manage dependencies and extend functionalities as needed.
  • OSGi support
    Karaf fully supports OSGi (Open Services Gateway initiative), which is a framework for developing and deploying modular software programs and libraries. This enables dynamic updates and replacement of modules without requiring a system restart.
  • Extensible and flexible
    Karaf's extensible architecture allows developers to integrate various technologies and custom modules, fostering a flexible environment that can suit a wide range of application types and requirements.
  • Enterprise features
    It provides a range of enterprise-ready features such as hot deployment, dynamic configuration, clustering, and high availability, which can help in building robust and scalable applications.
  • Comprehensive tooling
    Karaf comes with comprehensive tooling support including a powerful CLI, web console, and various tools for monitoring and managing the runtime environment. These tools simplify everyday management tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Karaf

  • Steeper learning curve
    Due to its modular and extensible nature, Apache Karaf can have a steeper learning curve for new users, especially those unfamiliar with OSGi concepts and enterprise middleware.
  • Resource intensity
    Running and managing an Apache Karaf instance can be resource-intensive, especially when dealing with large-scale or highly modular applications. Adequate memory and processing power are required to maintain optimal performance.
  • Complex deployment
    While Karaf can handle complex deployment scenarios, setting it up and configuring it properly can be more involved compared to other simpler solutions. This complexity can increase the initial setup time and effort.
  • Limited community support
    Despite being an Apache project, the community around Apache Karaf might not be as large or active as other popular frameworks, potentially making it harder to find ample resources or immediate support.
  • Dependency management challenges
    Managing dependencies in Karaf, especially when dealing with multiple third-party libraries and their versions, can become cumbersome and lead to conflicts if not handled carefully.

Google Site Reliability Engineering features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache Karaf videos

+ Add

EIK - How to use Apache Karaf inside of Eclipse

More videos:

  • Review - OpenDaylight's Apache Karaf Report- Jamie Goodyear

Google Site Reliability Engineering videos

No Google Site Reliability Engineering videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Karaf and Google Site Reliability Engineering)

Apache Karaf

Google Site Reliability Engineering

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
Software Development
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Containers As A Service
0 0%
Containers As A Service
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Karaf and Google Site Reliability Engineering. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Site Reliability Engineering seems to be a lot more popular than Apache Karaf. While we know about 86 links to Google Site Reliability Engineering, we've tracked only 1 mention of Apache Karaf. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Karaf mentions (1)

  • Need advice: Java Software Architecture for SaaS startup doing CRUD and REST APIs?
    Apache Karaf with OSGi works pretty nice using annotation based dependency injection with the declarative services, removing the need to mess with those hopefully archaic XML blueprints. Too bad it's not as trendy as spring and the developers so many of the tutorials can be a bit dated and hard to find. Karaf also supports many other frameworks and programming models as well and there's even Red Hat supported... Source: about 4 years ago

Google Site Reliability Engineering mentions (86)

  • Monitoring & Observability: New Tools to Watch in 2025
    In 2025, observability is no longer just for SREs or DevOps—it’s a cross-functional necessity. Whether you’re debugging a production outage, tracking performance regressions, or optimizing user experience, your observability tools should provide clarity, not clutter. - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
  • Ask HN: Why do websites have scheduled downtime if AWS/GCP prove its not needed?
    Same difference... Read the book https://sre.google/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Ask HN: What makes SRE great compared to "plain" DevOps?
    In my view it is having a dedicated team focusing their full mental bandwidth on pro-actively understanding and managing robustness of the system. In Pure DevOps, it seems to me developers often don't have the full picture of the system, and not enough bandwidth to foresee complex interactions from their changes. These are from my experiences spending one year as a developer in somewhat large a greenfield... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How Site Reliability Engineering Is Different From DevOps
    Site Reliability Engineering, introduced by Google, extends the principles of software engineering to operations. Unlike DevOps, SRE places a stronger emphasis on reliability, availability, and scalability. SRE teams are tasked with maintaining the health and performance of systems by applying engineering practices to operations. The ultimate objective is to achieve a balance between service reliability and... Source: over 1 year ago
  • API Product Managers, what's your workflow when designing and maintaining an API?
    Define SLOs for availability and latency. Google's SRE book is good reading for this. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Karaf and Google Site Reliability Engineering, you can also consider the following products

Docker - Docker is an open platform that enables developers and system administrators to create distributed applications.

Open Telemetry - An observability framework for cloud-native software.

Google App Engine - A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Ganeti - Ganeti is a cluster management tool built on top of existing virtualization technologies.

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Apache Helix - A cluster management framework for partitioned and replicated distributed resources

Loading...