Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache HTTP Server VS Loadbalancer.org

Compare Apache HTTP Server VS Loadbalancer.org and see what are their differences

Apache HTTP Server logo Apache HTTP Server

Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Loadbalancer.org logo Loadbalancer.org

Cloud-based & on-premise IT applications management solution
  • Apache HTTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21
  • Loadbalancer.org Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-09

Apache HTTP Server features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache HTTP Server is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This promotes a large, active community that contributes to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Cross-Platform
    Apache is compatible with a variety of operating systems, including Unix, Linux, and Windows, providing flexibility and widespread usability.
  • Highly Customizable
    It offers a modular architecture that allows users to enable or disable features as needed, and to extend functionality through modules.
  • Robust Documentation
    Apache provides comprehensive and detailed documentation, which makes it easier for users to install, configure, and troubleshoot the server.
  • Widespread Adoption
    With its long history and widespread use, Apache has proven to be reliable and trusted by many organizations worldwide, ensuring a level of trust and stability.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Apache includes many features out-of-the-box, such as SSL/TLS support, URL redirection, authentication, load balancing, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HTTP Server

  • Performance Overhead
    Compared to some lightweight web servers like Nginx, Apache can have higher memory and CPU usage, which may not be ideal for high concurrency needs.
  • Complex Configuration
    Apache's extensive customization options can lead to a complex configuration process, which may be challenging for beginners or those without specific expertise.
  • Less Efficient in Serving Static Content
    While Apache is highly capable, it may be less efficient at serving static content compared to specialized web servers like Nginx.
  • Initial Learning Curve
    Due to its rich features and configurability, new users might face a steep learning curve when first setting up and using Apache HTTP Server.
  • Module Compatibility Issues
    Sometimes, third-party modules may not always be compatible with the latest versions of Apache, causing potential integration issues.

Loadbalancer.org features and specs

  • High Availability
    Loadbalancer.org offers robust high availability to ensure that services remain operational even if one or more servers fail.
  • Scalability
    The platform provides excellent scalability options, allowing businesses to easily add more resources as their needs grow.
  • Ease of Use
    Loadbalancer.org is known for its user-friendly interface which simplifies configuration and management tasks.
  • Comprehensive Support
    The company offers extensive support services, including various support plans to assist with setup, configuration, and troubleshooting.
  • Versatile Deployment Options
    Users have the flexibility to deploy load balancers as physical, virtual, or cloud appliances, catering to diverse infrastructure needs.

Possible disadvantages of Loadbalancer.org

  • Cost
    The pricing for Loadbalancer.org products can be relatively high, which might not be suitable for small businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Complex Configurations for Advanced Features
    While basic configuration is straightforward, some advanced features might require more complex setups that could be challenging without technical expertise.
  • Limited Marketing and Brand Recognition
    Compared to larger competitors, Loadbalancer.org may not have the same level of brand recognition, which could impact perceived reliability and customer trust.
  • Hardware Dependency for Physical Appliances
    For those using physical appliances, there is a dependency on hardware which may lead to longer replacement times during failures.

Analysis of Apache HTTP Server

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Apache HTTP Server is generally considered a good and reliable web server.

Why this product is good

  • Apache HTTP Server is one of the most widely used and established web servers in the world. It is open-source, highly configurable, and supports a wide range of features through modules. Its robustness, extensive documentation, strong community support, and flexibility are some of the reasons it remains popular.

Recommended for

  • Developers and organizations looking for a reliable and versatile web server solution.
  • Those who need extensive customization and configuration options for their web environment.
  • Users who prefer an established platform with a large community and extensive documentation.
  • Teams that require compatibility with various operating systems and environments.

Apache HTTP Server videos

No Apache HTTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Loadbalancer.org videos

My review of Loadbalancer.org virtual appliance

More videos:

  • Demo - Loadbalancer.org system overview demo
  • Tutorial - How to deploy an initial configuration of the loadbalancer.org virtual appliance

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache HTTP Server and Loadbalancer.org)
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
97 97%
3% 3
Application Server
100 100%
0% 0
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache HTTP Server and Loadbalancer.org. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache HTTP Server and Loadbalancer.org

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server
However, compared to XAMPP and other popular web servers in the market Apache HTTP Server is a bit more complicated and is a little difficult to navigate for a complete newbie, but if you want to understand web development from the very fundamentals and understand how Apache as a web server software works then this software can be of great help to you.
Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
The most commonly used Web Server is by far Apache HTTP Server from the Software Apache Foundation. Created in 1995 by Rob McCool and Brian Behlendorf, among others. The name is a pun for A PatCHy server, as at the time of it’s inception, Apache was based on some existing code, along with some perhaps “hacky or clunky” software packages, enabling it to run. Additionally, the...
Source: chemicloud.com
10 Best alternatives of XAMPP servers for Windows, Linux and macOS
Apache is an open-source and free web server software that owns about 46% of websites worldwide. The official name is Apache HTTP Server and is maintained and developed by the Apache Software Foundation. This allows website owners to serve content on the web – hence the name “webserver”.
Top 5 open source web servers
As the Apache HTTP Server has been the most popular web server since 1996, it "benefits from great documentation and integrated support from other software projects." You can find more information on the Apache Foundation project page.
Source: opensource.com

Loadbalancer.org Reviews

We have no reviews of Loadbalancer.org yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache HTTP Server seems to be a lot more popular than Loadbalancer.org. While we know about 70 links to Apache HTTP Server, we've tracked only 1 mention of Loadbalancer.org. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache HTTP Server mentions (70)

View more

Loadbalancer.org mentions (1)

  • Top Preference on Load Balancers?
    Loadbalancer.org is a really good platform that I've used for years, however if the org is wanting to spend I am keen to see what industry standard options are available and being used. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache HTTP Server and Loadbalancer.org, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

DynConD - DynConD is a client-side Global Server Load Balancer (GSLB) and DNS-based service for optimal server selection and global server load balancing

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) - Find out more about PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) LLP including an overview, stats, history and other Accounting competitors.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Paytm - Paytm is a massively used mobile application that offers a simple way to send or receive money using QR Code Scanner.