Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache HTTP Server VS ASP.NET MVC

Compare Apache HTTP Server VS ASP.NET MVC and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache HTTP Server logo Apache HTTP Server

Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

ASP.NET MVC logo ASP.NET MVC

Download ASP.NET MVC and learn how to build web apps using the model view controller pattern.
  • Apache HTTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21
  • ASP.NET MVC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26

Apache HTTP Server features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache HTTP Server is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This promotes a large, active community that contributes to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Cross-Platform
    Apache is compatible with a variety of operating systems, including Unix, Linux, and Windows, providing flexibility and widespread usability.
  • Highly Customizable
    It offers a modular architecture that allows users to enable or disable features as needed, and to extend functionality through modules.
  • Robust Documentation
    Apache provides comprehensive and detailed documentation, which makes it easier for users to install, configure, and troubleshoot the server.
  • Widespread Adoption
    With its long history and widespread use, Apache has proven to be reliable and trusted by many organizations worldwide, ensuring a level of trust and stability.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Apache includes many features out-of-the-box, such as SSL/TLS support, URL redirection, authentication, load balancing, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HTTP Server

  • Performance Overhead
    Compared to some lightweight web servers like Nginx, Apache can have higher memory and CPU usage, which may not be ideal for high concurrency needs.
  • Complex Configuration
    Apache's extensive customization options can lead to a complex configuration process, which may be challenging for beginners or those without specific expertise.
  • Less Efficient in Serving Static Content
    While Apache is highly capable, it may be less efficient at serving static content compared to specialized web servers like Nginx.
  • Initial Learning Curve
    Due to its rich features and configurability, new users might face a steep learning curve when first setting up and using Apache HTTP Server.
  • Module Compatibility Issues
    Sometimes, third-party modules may not always be compatible with the latest versions of Apache, causing potential integration issues.

ASP.NET MVC features and specs

  • Separation of Concerns
    ASP.NET MVC enforces a clear separation between the model, view, and controller components, which helps in managing and structuring code more efficiently.
  • Testability
    The framework is inherently testable due to its separation of concerns and design pattern, facilitating unit testing of both the controllers and business logic.
  • Extensibility
    ASP.NET MVC is highly extensible, allowing developers to customize components like routing, view engines, serialization, and others as per their needs.
  • Powerful Routing
    The framework provides a powerful and flexible URL routing system that makes it easy to create SEO-friendly URLs.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    Developers can leverage the rich .NET ecosystem, utilizing libraries, tools, and third-party extensions that are compatible with ASP.NET.

Possible disadvantages of ASP.NET MVC

  • Complexity for Small Applications
    For smaller applications, the overhead of setting up and maintaining the MVC structure might be more complex than necessary.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Developers coming from a WebForms background or without MVC experience might find the ASP.NET MVC framework more challenging to learn initially.
  • Lacks Built-in Controls
    Unlike ASP.NET WebForms, ASP.NET MVC does not provide a wide range of built-in server controls, which can increase the time to develop certain UI components.
  • Heavy on Convention
    The framework is built heavily on conventions, which might not appeal to developers who prefer configuration over convention.

Apache HTTP Server videos

No Apache HTTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

ASP.NET MVC videos

+ Add

Step-by-step ASP.NET MVC Tutorial for Beginners | Mosh

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to ASP.NET MVC in C#: Basics, Advanced Topics, Tips, Tricks, Best Practices, and More

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache HTTP Server and ASP.NET MVC)

Apache HTTP Server

ASP.NET MVC

Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100
Web Servers
100 100%
Web Servers
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache HTTP Server and ASP.NET MVC. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache HTTP Server and ASP.NET MVC

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server
However, compared to XAMPP and other popular web servers in the market Apache HTTP Server is a bit more complicated and is a little difficult to navigate for a complete newbie, but if you want to understand web development from the very fundamentals and understand how Apache as a web server software works then this software can be of great help to you.
Source: technicalustad.com
Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
The most commonly used Web Server is by far Apache HTTP Server from the Software Apache Foundation. Created in 1995 by Rob McCool and Brian Behlendorf, among others. The name is a pun for A PatCHy server, as at the time of it’s inception, Apache was based on some existing code, along with some perhaps “hacky or clunky” software packages, enabling it to run. Additionally, the...
Source: chemicloud.com
10 Best alternatives of XAMPP servers for Windows, Linux and macOS
Apache is an open-source and free web server software that owns about 46% of websites worldwide. The official name is Apache HTTP Server and is maintained and developed by the Apache Software Foundation. This allows website owners to serve content on the web – hence the name “webserver”.
Source: www.isrgrajan.com
Top 5 open source web servers
As the Apache HTTP Server has been the most popular web server since 1996, it "benefits from great documentation and integrated support from other software projects." You can find more information on the Apache Foundation project page.
Source: opensource.com

ASP.NET MVC Reviews

We have no reviews of ASP.NET MVC yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache HTTP Server seems to be a lot more popular than ASP.NET MVC. While we know about 66 links to Apache HTTP Server, we've tracked only 2 mentions of ASP.NET MVC. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache HTTP Server mentions (66)

  • Unveiling GNU Free Documentation License 1.3: A Comprehensive Exploration of Its Depths, Applications, and Future Trends
    Example: Various technical documentation projects on platforms like Apache HTTP Server have implemented GFDL clauses to safeguard documentation integrity. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
  • Open Source: A Goldmine for Indie Hackers
    Open source software is built on the democratic idea that everyone should be able to inspect and contribute to the source code. Major projects like Linux, WordPress, and the Apache HTTP Server have shown how collaborative efforts can produce robust, scalable solutions. Indie hackers, often working with limited budgets, gain access to highly dependable tools such as Python and MySQL, which were originally developed... - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • Unveiling a Licensing Legend: The Netscape Public License 1.1
    The Netscape Public License 1.1 served as a crucial stepping stone for modern open source licensing models. Developed by Netscape Communications Corporation, it was designed to encourage global community collaboration while safeguarding intellectual property. During the rise of the open source movement, the license provided a much-needed balance between transparency and control, making it a frequent subject of... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling GNU FDL 1.2: A Deep Dive into Free Documentation Licensing
    Adoption, Use Cases, and Comparative Analysis: Projects ranging from community manuals to major software endeavors like the Apache HTTP Server have adopted the GNU FDL 1.2 to preserve the spirit of open documentation. While its copyleft nature ensures that every modification remains free, critics argue that the rigidity of the license may deter commercial integration. This is contrasted with alternative licensing... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling GNU FDL 1.1: A Deep Dive into Free Documentation Licensing
    GNU FDL 1.1 was created by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) with the intent of bringing the same freedoms found in free software to documentation. Many notable projects, including those under the aegis of the Apache HTTP Server, have benefited from a documentation license that guarantees continued openness and proper attribution. Throughout our exploration, we will delve into the evolution, strengths, and... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

ASP.NET MVC mentions (2)

  • ELI5: .NET ecosystem & equivalents
    IMO, .NET's strength is Web API. If you're wanting to build user interfaces, go with Next, Nuxt or Sveltekit. If you want to build user interfaces with .NET, go with ASP.NET MVC. Source: about 2 years ago
  • OWASP Top Ten and Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
    After processing the entries, the analyzer concludes that they are all related to various versions of a product with the name "asp.net_model_view_controller" released by a company called Microsoft. All these entries correspond to a vulnerability with the CVE-2014-4075 identifier. However, the library in which the vulnerability was discovered is called "System.Web.Mvc". Most likely we'll get this name from the list... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache HTTP Server and ASP.NET MVC, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

CodeIgniter - A Fully Baked PHP Framework

Loading...